Identifying Worry in Twitter: Beyond Emotion Analysis

Reyha Verma, C. von der Weth, Jithin Vachery, M. Kankanhalli
{"title":"Identifying Worry in Twitter: Beyond Emotion Analysis","authors":"Reyha Verma, C. von der Weth, Jithin Vachery, M. Kankanhalli","doi":"10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcss-1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying the worries of individuals and societies plays a crucial role in providing social support and enhancing policy decision-making. Due to the popularity of social media platforms such as Twitter, users share worries about personal issues (e.g., health, finances, relationships) and broader issues (e.g., changes in society, environmental concerns, terrorism) freely. In this paper, we explore and evaluate a wide range of machine learning models to predict worry on Twitter. While this task has been closely associated with emotion prediction, we argue and show that identifying worry needs to be addressed as a separate task given the unique challenges associated with it. We conduct a user study to provide evidence that social media posts express two basic kinds of worry – normative and pathological – as stated in psychology literature. In addition, we show that existing emotion detection techniques underperform, especially while capturing normative worry. Finally, we discuss the current limitations of our approach and propose future applications of the worry identification system.","PeriodicalId":398724,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcss-1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Identifying the worries of individuals and societies plays a crucial role in providing social support and enhancing policy decision-making. Due to the popularity of social media platforms such as Twitter, users share worries about personal issues (e.g., health, finances, relationships) and broader issues (e.g., changes in society, environmental concerns, terrorism) freely. In this paper, we explore and evaluate a wide range of machine learning models to predict worry on Twitter. While this task has been closely associated with emotion prediction, we argue and show that identifying worry needs to be addressed as a separate task given the unique challenges associated with it. We conduct a user study to provide evidence that social media posts express two basic kinds of worry – normative and pathological – as stated in psychology literature. In addition, we show that existing emotion detection techniques underperform, especially while capturing normative worry. Finally, we discuss the current limitations of our approach and propose future applications of the worry identification system.
在推特上识别担忧:超越情感分析
识别个人和社会的担忧对于提供社会支持和加强政策决策具有至关重要的作用。由于Twitter等社交媒体平台的普及,用户可以自由地分享对个人问题(如健康、财务、人际关系)和更广泛问题(如社会变化、环境问题、恐怖主义)的担忧。在本文中,我们探索和评估了广泛的机器学习模型来预测Twitter上的担忧。虽然这项任务与情绪预测密切相关,但我们认为,鉴于与之相关的独特挑战,识别担忧需要作为一项单独的任务来解决。我们进行了一项用户研究,以提供证据,证明社交媒体帖子表达了心理学文献中所述的两种基本担忧——规范性和病态。此外,我们发现现有的情绪检测技术表现不佳,特别是在捕捉规范性担忧时。最后,我们讨论了当前方法的局限性,并提出了担忧识别系统的未来应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信