Online FDA Resources Versus Data on File: Minimizing Data on File in Standard Medical Response Letters

Nancy Hwang, Angie S. Graham, Marbel Catolico
{"title":"Online FDA Resources Versus Data on File: Minimizing Data on File in Standard Medical Response Letters","authors":"Nancy Hwang, Angie S. Graham, Marbel Catolico","doi":"10.1177/0092861512440849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Reviewers’ summaries and other documents routinely posted on the FDA website have been cited in published studies and by tertiary drug information resources. Because they can contain information otherwise undisclosed to the public, they could potentially replace certain data on file references in standard medical response letters. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether publicly available information from the FDA website ( https://doi.org/www.fda.gov ) could reduce the need to use data on file as a reference in industry drug information service standard response letters. Methods Eighty-six standard response letters for 4 drug products, containing 272 data on file references, were assessed to determine whether data on file could be replaced using online FDA medical reviews or advisory committee briefing documents. Results Thirty-two percent (87/272) of data on file references were found to be replaceable with existing information on the FDA website. Conclusions Online FDA resources may sometimes be used in lieu of data on file in standard medical response letters.","PeriodicalId":391574,"journal":{"name":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512440849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Reviewers’ summaries and other documents routinely posted on the FDA website have been cited in published studies and by tertiary drug information resources. Because they can contain information otherwise undisclosed to the public, they could potentially replace certain data on file references in standard medical response letters. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether publicly available information from the FDA website ( https://doi.org/www.fda.gov ) could reduce the need to use data on file as a reference in industry drug information service standard response letters. Methods Eighty-six standard response letters for 4 drug products, containing 272 data on file references, were assessed to determine whether data on file could be replaced using online FDA medical reviews or advisory committee briefing documents. Results Thirty-two percent (87/272) of data on file references were found to be replaceable with existing information on the FDA website. Conclusions Online FDA resources may sometimes be used in lieu of data on file in standard medical response letters.
在线FDA资源与存档数据:最小化标准医疗响应函中的存档数据
在FDA网站上例行发布的审稿人总结和其他文件已被已发表的研究和三级药物信息资源引用。由于它们可能包含未向公众披露的信息,因此它们可能取代标准医疗回应信中文件参考中的某些数据。目的本研究的目的是评估FDA网站(https://doi.org/www.fda.gov)上的公开信息是否可以减少在行业药品信息服务标准回复函中使用存档数据作为参考的需要。方法对4种药品的86封标准答复函进行评估,其中包含272份档案参考数据,以确定档案数据是否可以用FDA在线医学审查或咨询委员会简报文件代替。结果发现32%(87/272)的文件参考数据可被FDA网站上的现有信息替代。结论:在线FDA资源有时可以用来代替标准医疗回应信中的存档数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信