Evolving Perceptions of Central Bank Credibility: The European Central Bank Experience

Abstract

What are the preferences of a central bank over inflation and output-gap stabilization objectives, and what is its preferred long-run inflation rate? While statements of priorities and goals are important, the credibility of such statements and the market perception of the policy reaction function of a central bank play a key role in determining economic outcomes. This point, early on described as the “credibility” of central bank policies, is a standard theoretical result with recent interpretation in the New Keynesian paradigms. It is also received wisdom among practitioners. The importance of the market perception of the central bank’s acceptable trade-offs between inflation and output goals as well its specific targets naturally leads to the question of how the market acquires this perception and whether and how it evolves over time. One view is that establishing an appropriate institutional structure is the key element in insulating the monetary authority from political pressure and thereby convincing markets that a central bank has a strong and unvarying aversion to inflation. A second, more dynamic, view focuses on the role that actual policy conduct plays in building the reputation of a central bank. These two different views have distinct implications for the relative importance of the institutional structure of a central bank, as compared to its conduct, for attaining and maintaining its credibility. A survey of the heads of central banks and prominent monetary economists reflects a belief that the credibility of a central bank is based more on its past actions than on institutional structures that afford it independence by insulating it from political concerns, although there is also a consensus that structurematters (Blinder 2000). Empirical research has found that institutional features related to central bank independence are associated with economic performance in cross sections of