Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Protective Behaviour Detection Under Class Imbalance from MoCap and EMG data

Karim Radouane, Andon Tchechmedjiev, Binbin Xu, S. Harispe
{"title":"Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Protective Behaviour Detection Under Class Imbalance from MoCap and EMG data","authors":"Karim Radouane, Andon Tchechmedjiev, Binbin Xu, S. Harispe","doi":"10.1109/aciiw52867.2021.9666417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The AffecMove challenge organised in the context of the H2020 EnTimeMent project offers three tasks of movement classification in realistic settings and use-cases. Our team, from the EuroMov DHM laboratory participated in Task 1, for protective behaviour (against pain) detection from motion capture data and EMG, in patients suffering from pain-inducing muskuloskeletal disorders. We implemented two simple baseline systems, one LSTM system with pre-training (NTU-60) and a Transformer. We also adapted PA-ResGCN a Graph Convolutional Network for skeleton-based action classification showing state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance to protective behaviour detection, augmented with strategies to handle class-imbalance. For PA-ResGCN-N51 we explored naïve fusion strategies with an EMG-only convolutional neural network that didn't improve the overall performance. Unsurprisingly, the best performing system was PA-ResGCN-N51 (w/o EMG) with a F1 score of 53.36% on the test set for the minority class (MCC 0.4247). The Transformer baseline (MoCap + EMG) came second at 41.05% F1 test performance (MCC 0.3523) and the LSTM baseline third at 31.16% F1 (MCC 0.1763). On the validation set the LSTM showed performance comparable to PA-ResGCN, we hypothesize that the LSTM over-fitted on the validation set that wasn't very representative of the train/test distribution.","PeriodicalId":105376,"journal":{"name":"2021 9th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos (ACIIW)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 9th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos (ACIIW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/aciiw52867.2021.9666417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The AffecMove challenge organised in the context of the H2020 EnTimeMent project offers three tasks of movement classification in realistic settings and use-cases. Our team, from the EuroMov DHM laboratory participated in Task 1, for protective behaviour (against pain) detection from motion capture data and EMG, in patients suffering from pain-inducing muskuloskeletal disorders. We implemented two simple baseline systems, one LSTM system with pre-training (NTU-60) and a Transformer. We also adapted PA-ResGCN a Graph Convolutional Network for skeleton-based action classification showing state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance to protective behaviour detection, augmented with strategies to handle class-imbalance. For PA-ResGCN-N51 we explored naïve fusion strategies with an EMG-only convolutional neural network that didn't improve the overall performance. Unsurprisingly, the best performing system was PA-ResGCN-N51 (w/o EMG) with a F1 score of 53.36% on the test set for the minority class (MCC 0.4247). The Transformer baseline (MoCap + EMG) came second at 41.05% F1 test performance (MCC 0.3523) and the LSTM baseline third at 31.16% F1 (MCC 0.1763). On the validation set the LSTM showed performance comparable to PA-ResGCN, we hypothesize that the LSTM over-fitted on the validation set that wasn't very representative of the train/test distribution.
基于动作捕捉和肌电图数据的类不平衡保护行为检测的深度学习方法比较
在H2020环境项目背景下组织的AffecMove挑战在现实环境和用例中提供了三个运动分类任务。我们来自EuroMov DHM实验室的团队参与了任务1,从运动捕捉数据和肌电图中检测患有疼痛性肌肉骨骼疾病的患者的保护行为(对疼痛)。我们实现了两个简单的基线系统,一个带预训练的LSTM系统(NTU-60)和一个Transformer。我们还改编了PA-ResGCN,这是一个基于骨架的动作分类的图卷积网络,显示了最先进的(SOTA)性能,用于保护行为检测,并增强了处理类别不平衡的策略。对于PA-ResGCN-N51,我们探索了naïve与仅肌电图卷积神经网络的融合策略,但并未提高整体性能。不出所料,表现最好的系统是PA-ResGCN-N51 (w/o EMG),在少数族裔(MCC 0.4247)的测试集上F1得分为53.36%。Transformer基线(MoCap + EMG)以41.05%的F1测试性能(MCC 0.3523)排名第二,LSTM基线以31.16%的F1 (MCC 0.1763)排名第三。在验证集上,LSTM表现出与PA-ResGCN相当的性能,我们假设LSTM在验证集上过度拟合,这不是很能代表训练/测试分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信