Hybrid approaches of accident modeling for risk management in socio-technical systems

M. Kiwan, D. Berezkin, A. Hamed
{"title":"Hybrid approaches of accident modeling for risk management in socio-technical systems","authors":"M. Kiwan, D. Berezkin, A. Hamed","doi":"10.18127/j19997493-202102-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statement of a problem. The increasing complexity in high-tech systems leads to potentially disastrous failure models and new kinds of safety issues. This led to the development of new approaches, for modeling accidents and risk management. In recent years, extended and hybrid approaches have been gaining popularity due to their effectiveness in decision-making for the design and operation of socio-technical systems. The proliferation of these approaches makes it difficult to select the appropriate approach for a particular system. Purpose. Conduct a comparative analysis of various hybrid approaches of accidents in complex systems, identify the strengths and weaknesses of each one, and study the feasibility of their use in risk management in socio-technical systems. Results. The paper analyzes the main approaches of accident modeling (FRAM, STAMP, failure tree, AcciMap) and their limitations in determining cause-effect relationships and dynamics of modern complex systems. New approaches to safety and accident modeling in sociotechnical systems are discussed, these approaches depend on combining several models into one hybrid approach: FuzzyFTA, FRAM-ANP, ACAT-FRAM, STAMP-HFACS, AcciMap-ANP, and SD-ET-FT-ANN. A review of hybrid approaches of accident modeling in complex systems and identify weaknesses and strengths, as well as the application field of each one of these approaches. Practical importance. This study will be a guide for researchers in the field of accident modeling and risk management in sociotechnical systems. It also concludes that it is necessary to use different approaches to risk management depending on the type of risk and the complexity of the system.","PeriodicalId":370962,"journal":{"name":"Dynamics of Complex Systems - XXI century","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamics of Complex Systems - XXI century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18127/j19997493-202102-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Statement of a problem. The increasing complexity in high-tech systems leads to potentially disastrous failure models and new kinds of safety issues. This led to the development of new approaches, for modeling accidents and risk management. In recent years, extended and hybrid approaches have been gaining popularity due to their effectiveness in decision-making for the design and operation of socio-technical systems. The proliferation of these approaches makes it difficult to select the appropriate approach for a particular system. Purpose. Conduct a comparative analysis of various hybrid approaches of accidents in complex systems, identify the strengths and weaknesses of each one, and study the feasibility of their use in risk management in socio-technical systems. Results. The paper analyzes the main approaches of accident modeling (FRAM, STAMP, failure tree, AcciMap) and their limitations in determining cause-effect relationships and dynamics of modern complex systems. New approaches to safety and accident modeling in sociotechnical systems are discussed, these approaches depend on combining several models into one hybrid approach: FuzzyFTA, FRAM-ANP, ACAT-FRAM, STAMP-HFACS, AcciMap-ANP, and SD-ET-FT-ANN. A review of hybrid approaches of accident modeling in complex systems and identify weaknesses and strengths, as well as the application field of each one of these approaches. Practical importance. This study will be a guide for researchers in the field of accident modeling and risk management in sociotechnical systems. It also concludes that it is necessary to use different approaches to risk management depending on the type of risk and the complexity of the system.
社会技术系统中风险管理事故建模的混合方法
问题的陈述。高科技系统的日益复杂导致了潜在的灾难性故障模型和新的安全问题。这导致了事故建模和风险管理新方法的发展。近年来,由于在社会技术系统的设计和运作决策方面的有效性,扩展和混合方法越来越受欢迎。这些方法的激增使得为特定系统选择适当的方法变得困难。目的。对复杂系统中事故的各种混合方法进行比较分析,确定每种方法的优缺点,并研究其在社会技术系统风险管理中使用的可行性。结果。分析了事故建模的主要方法(FRAM、STAMP、故障树、AcciMap)及其在确定现代复杂系统的因果关系和动力学方面的局限性。讨论了社会技术系统中安全和事故建模的新方法,这些方法依赖于将几个模型组合成一个混合方法:FuzzyFTA, FRAM-ANP, ACAT-FRAM, STAMP-HFACS, AcciMap-ANP和SD-ET-FT-ANN。综述了复杂系统中事故建模的混合方法,指出了每种方法的优缺点,以及每种方法的应用领域。实际的重要性。本研究将为社会技术系统中事故建模和风险管理领域的研究人员提供指导。它还得出结论,根据风险的类型和系统的复杂性,有必要使用不同的风险管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信