Good standards for smart meters

R. Hoenkamp, G. Huitema
{"title":"Good standards for smart meters","authors":"R. Hoenkamp, G. Huitema","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2012.6254820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines what lessons can be learned from the rollout of smart meters in the Netherlands to improve the European smart meter standardization. This study is based on the case of the Dutch meter rollout which preparations started in 2005 but finally was delayed until 2011 by governmental concerns about privacy infringements. The focus of our study lies on how the public interests were represented in this case and how these were taken into account during the standardization process. From this case it becomes clear how technological and commercial interests dominated the process while public interests such as the production of renewable energy were ignored. Many privacy aspects that caused the delay in the Dutch case might be repeated on a European level as well, as these aspects are part of EU approach too. This situation can harm the progress in the smart meter rollout, as well as invoking public rejection of the smart meter, since public concerns are ignored in the architecture of the meter. In this paper we will show that these issues can be dealt with by applying existing EU principles of good governance. In particular these principles are intended to ensure a proportional balancing of interests between stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":383754,"journal":{"name":"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2012.6254820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

This paper examines what lessons can be learned from the rollout of smart meters in the Netherlands to improve the European smart meter standardization. This study is based on the case of the Dutch meter rollout which preparations started in 2005 but finally was delayed until 2011 by governmental concerns about privacy infringements. The focus of our study lies on how the public interests were represented in this case and how these were taken into account during the standardization process. From this case it becomes clear how technological and commercial interests dominated the process while public interests such as the production of renewable energy were ignored. Many privacy aspects that caused the delay in the Dutch case might be repeated on a European level as well, as these aspects are part of EU approach too. This situation can harm the progress in the smart meter rollout, as well as invoking public rejection of the smart meter, since public concerns are ignored in the architecture of the meter. In this paper we will show that these issues can be dealt with by applying existing EU principles of good governance. In particular these principles are intended to ensure a proportional balancing of interests between stakeholders.
智能电表的良好标准
本文探讨了荷兰智能电表的推出可以吸取哪些教训,以提高欧洲智能电表的标准化。这项研究是基于荷兰电表推出的案例,该案例的准备工作始于2005年,但最终由于政府担心侵犯隐私而推迟到2011年。我们研究的重点在于如何在这个案例中代表公共利益,以及这些利益在标准化过程中是如何被考虑到的。从这个案例中可以清楚地看出,技术和商业利益如何主导了这一过程,而诸如可再生能源生产等公共利益却被忽视了。在荷兰案例中导致延迟的许多隐私方面可能也会在欧洲层面上重复,因为这些方面也是欧盟方法的一部分。这种情况可能会损害智能电表推广的进展,并引发公众对智能电表的拒绝,因为公众的关注在电表的架构中被忽视了。在本文中,我们将展示这些问题可以通过应用现有的欧盟善治原则来解决。特别是,这些原则旨在确保利益相关者之间的利益比例平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书