EU Financial Regulation, Contract Law and Sustainable Consumer Finance

O. Cherednychenko
{"title":"EU Financial Regulation, Contract Law and Sustainable Consumer Finance","authors":"O. Cherednychenko","doi":"10.5040/9781509928385.ch-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The post-crisis era presents major new challenges for the EU legislator in terms of effectively safeguarding the public and private interests in the realm of consumer finance in an increasingly digital environment. New and innovative ways of addressing tensions and contradictions between the common good and individual preferences of market actors in the retail financial markets are needed in order to be able to close the gap between consumer finance and society. However, at present, the efforts to develop workable solutions are seriously hampered by the existence of another gap – the gap between financial regulation and contract law in the current European policy discourse and legal scholarship. In the context of EU law-making, this gap manifests itself, in particular, in a contradictory policy agenda for the retail financial markets, insufficient attention to contract practice, and a lack of a coherent and effective enforcement strategy. While the effectiveness of EU financial regulation in the prudential and conduct of business domains depends on a broader legal framework that often reaches far beyond its regulatory ambit, the post-crisis legal matrix for consumer finance is developing in a piecemeal fashion without a clear and coherent vision of consumer financial contracts for the current millennium. In order to reduce the gap between financial regulation and contract law in the EU policy discourse, this chapter has suggested to better integrate the ‘contract law’ dimension of consumer finance into the assessment of existing and new regulatory measures in this area on the basis of a novel concept of sustainable consumer financial contracts. Such an approach fits into the EU's Better Regulation agenda and its sustainable development strategy, which provide an opportunity to critically rethink the role of contract law in the current regulatory landscape, both in relation to standard-setting and enforcement.","PeriodicalId":430410,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509928385.ch-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The post-crisis era presents major new challenges for the EU legislator in terms of effectively safeguarding the public and private interests in the realm of consumer finance in an increasingly digital environment. New and innovative ways of addressing tensions and contradictions between the common good and individual preferences of market actors in the retail financial markets are needed in order to be able to close the gap between consumer finance and society. However, at present, the efforts to develop workable solutions are seriously hampered by the existence of another gap – the gap between financial regulation and contract law in the current European policy discourse and legal scholarship. In the context of EU law-making, this gap manifests itself, in particular, in a contradictory policy agenda for the retail financial markets, insufficient attention to contract practice, and a lack of a coherent and effective enforcement strategy. While the effectiveness of EU financial regulation in the prudential and conduct of business domains depends on a broader legal framework that often reaches far beyond its regulatory ambit, the post-crisis legal matrix for consumer finance is developing in a piecemeal fashion without a clear and coherent vision of consumer financial contracts for the current millennium. In order to reduce the gap between financial regulation and contract law in the EU policy discourse, this chapter has suggested to better integrate the ‘contract law’ dimension of consumer finance into the assessment of existing and new regulatory measures in this area on the basis of a novel concept of sustainable consumer financial contracts. Such an approach fits into the EU's Better Regulation agenda and its sustainable development strategy, which provide an opportunity to critically rethink the role of contract law in the current regulatory landscape, both in relation to standard-setting and enforcement.
欧盟金融监管、合同法与可持续消费金融
在后危机时代,欧盟立法者在日益数字化的环境中有效维护消费金融领域的公共和私人利益方面面临着重大的新挑战。为了能够缩小消费金融与社会之间的差距,需要新的和创新的方法来解决零售金融市场中共同利益和市场参与者个人偏好之间的紧张和矛盾。然而,目前,制定可行解决办法的努力受到另一个差距的严重阻碍- -目前欧洲政策话语和法律学术中金融监管与合同法之间的差距。在欧盟立法的背景下,这种差距尤其表现在零售金融市场的政策议程相互矛盾,对合同实践的关注不足,以及缺乏连贯有效的执行策略。尽管欧盟金融监管在审慎和商业行为领域的有效性取决于一个更广泛的法律框架,而这个框架往往远远超出了其监管范围,但危机后的消费者金融法律矩阵正以一种零敲碎打的方式发展,没有对当前千年的消费者金融合同形成清晰而连贯的愿景。为了缩小欧盟政策话语中金融监管和合同法之间的差距,本章建议在可持续消费者金融合同的新概念的基础上,更好地将消费金融的“合同法”维度整合到该领域现有和新的监管措施的评估中。这种方法符合欧盟的“更好的监管议程”及其可持续发展战略,这为批判性地重新思考合同法在当前监管环境中的作用提供了机会,无论是在标准制定还是执行方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信