Improving Academic Performance in Geometry Using a Mastery Learning Approach through GeoGebra

P. Khansila, Wannatida Yonwilad, Prapaporn Nongharnpituk, Suwannawat Thienyutthakul
{"title":"Improving Academic Performance in Geometry Using a Mastery Learning Approach through GeoGebra","authors":"P. Khansila, Wannatida Yonwilad, Prapaporn Nongharnpituk, Suwannawat Thienyutthakul","doi":"10.5296/jei.v8i2.20494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of these quasi-experimental methods were to improve academic performance in geometry using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra for mathematics teacher students and to investigate students’ satisfaction with using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra in geometry. The participants were divided into two groups, involving 30 and 29 students, respectively. The experimental group with 30 students received instruction in the mastery learning approach through GeoGebra, while the control group received a traditional education in learning geometry. At the end of the lessons, post-tests were administered to both groups. The statistical difference between the participant’s post-test academic performance in the experimental and control groups was analyzed with an independent sample t-test after examining the assumptions of this test, namely normality and homogeneity in each group, while percentages and means were used to assess the satisfaction of the experimental group. The instruments used were the Geometry Achievement Test (GAT), which consists of 2D and 3D dimensions, and a questionnaire with satisfied students. Results of the study indicated that the scores of academic performances in the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group. Analysis of the questionnaire responses indicated a positive overall satisfaction with using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra in geometry. On the other hand, instruction with a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra supported students’ learning of these subjects meaningfully and conceptually.","PeriodicalId":314203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Issues","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v8i2.20494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objectives of these quasi-experimental methods were to improve academic performance in geometry using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra for mathematics teacher students and to investigate students’ satisfaction with using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra in geometry. The participants were divided into two groups, involving 30 and 29 students, respectively. The experimental group with 30 students received instruction in the mastery learning approach through GeoGebra, while the control group received a traditional education in learning geometry. At the end of the lessons, post-tests were administered to both groups. The statistical difference between the participant’s post-test academic performance in the experimental and control groups was analyzed with an independent sample t-test after examining the assumptions of this test, namely normality and homogeneity in each group, while percentages and means were used to assess the satisfaction of the experimental group. The instruments used were the Geometry Achievement Test (GAT), which consists of 2D and 3D dimensions, and a questionnaire with satisfied students. Results of the study indicated that the scores of academic performances in the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group. Analysis of the questionnaire responses indicated a positive overall satisfaction with using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra in geometry. On the other hand, instruction with a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra supported students’ learning of these subjects meaningfully and conceptually.
通过GeoGebra运用掌握式学习方法提高几何学习成绩
这些准实验方法的目的是提高数学教师学生使用GeoGebra掌握学习方法在几何方面的学习成绩,并调查学生使用GeoGebra掌握学习方法在几何方面的满意度。参与者被分成两组,分别有30名和29名学生。实验组30名学生通过GeoGebra学习掌握式学习方法,对照组接受传统几何教育。在课程结束时,两组都进行了后测试。实验组与对照组受试者测试后学业成绩的统计差异在检验各组正态性和齐性假设后,采用独立样本t检验进行分析,实验组满意度采用百分比和均值评估。使用的工具是几何成绩测试(GAT),由二维和三维维度组成,并对满意的学生进行问卷调查。研究结果表明,实验组学生的学业成绩显著高于对照组。问卷调查结果的分析表明,通过GeoGebra在几何中使用掌握学习方法的总体满意度为正。另一方面,通过GeoGebra采用掌握式学习方法的教学支持了学生对这些学科的有意义和概念性的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信