Transparency in Portuguese media: from the buzzword to the unsolved regulatory challenge

Carla Filipe Baptista
{"title":"Transparency in Portuguese media: from the buzzword to the unsolved regulatory challenge","authors":"Carla Filipe Baptista","doi":"10.15847/obsobs16220221952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transparency is a long-discussed term in journalism. It has been conceptualized as an evolving professional value, a political issue, and a regulatory challenge. In the disinformed digital age, became a rescue criterion to rebuild a credible relationship with the public based on trustworthiness. Transparency urges for holistic approaches, due to its inherent instability and variability across media systems; political, economic, and regulatory frameworks; and editorial cultures. This article analyses media transparency from a local perspective, departing from the launching of the Platform of Transparency by the Portuguese Media Authority (ERC). The Portuguese case stands in a European space deprived of international standards to assess media transparency, even if the concept is broadly discursively constructed as a key element of media pluralism. An increasingly fragmented media landscape degrades ethical standards based on shared values and favors the des activation of transparency as a disruptive transforming professional practice. The benevolent Portuguese initiative may provide political legitimacy to a narrowed version of media transparency, confined to issues of accountability and assumptions of political independence. Will the prevailing “fortress newsroom” (Smith, 2005; Meier 2009) survive to a transparent account department?","PeriodicalId":149155,"journal":{"name":"Observatorio (OBS*)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observatorio (OBS*)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15847/obsobs16220221952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transparency is a long-discussed term in journalism. It has been conceptualized as an evolving professional value, a political issue, and a regulatory challenge. In the disinformed digital age, became a rescue criterion to rebuild a credible relationship with the public based on trustworthiness. Transparency urges for holistic approaches, due to its inherent instability and variability across media systems; political, economic, and regulatory frameworks; and editorial cultures. This article analyses media transparency from a local perspective, departing from the launching of the Platform of Transparency by the Portuguese Media Authority (ERC). The Portuguese case stands in a European space deprived of international standards to assess media transparency, even if the concept is broadly discursively constructed as a key element of media pluralism. An increasingly fragmented media landscape degrades ethical standards based on shared values and favors the des activation of transparency as a disruptive transforming professional practice. The benevolent Portuguese initiative may provide political legitimacy to a narrowed version of media transparency, confined to issues of accountability and assumptions of political independence. Will the prevailing “fortress newsroom” (Smith, 2005; Meier 2009) survive to a transparent account department?
葡萄牙媒体的透明度:从流行语到未解决的监管挑战
透明度是新闻业长期讨论的一个术语。它已被概念化为一个不断发展的专业价值、一个政治问题和一个监管挑战。在信息不灵通的数字时代,在可信赖的基础上重建与公众的可信关系成为了一种拯救标准。透明度要求采取整体办法,因为其内在的不稳定性和跨媒体系统的可变性;政治、经济和监管框架;编辑文化。本文以葡萄牙媒体管理局(ERC)推出的透明平台为背景,从本地角度分析媒体透明度。葡萄牙案例所处的欧洲空间缺乏评估媒体透明度的国际标准,尽管这个概念在广泛的话语中被构建为媒体多元化的关键要素。日益分散的媒体环境降低了基于共同价值观的道德标准,并倾向于将透明度作为一种颠覆性的专业实践。善意的葡萄牙倡议可能会为媒体透明度的狭隘版本提供政治合法性,仅限于问责制和政治独立的假设问题。将盛行的“堡垒新闻编辑室”(史密斯,2005;(Meier 2009)生存到一个透明的会计部门?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信