The Anguish of Freedom: Is Sartre’s Existentialism an Appropriate Foundation for a Theory of Antisemitism?

Ingo Elbe
{"title":"The Anguish of Freedom: Is Sartre’s Existentialism an Appropriate Foundation for a Theory of Antisemitism?","authors":"Ingo Elbe","doi":"10.2979/antistud.4.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article questions the theoretical background to Jean-Paul Sartre’s thesis, formulated in Anti-Semite and Jew, that antisemitism is “a free and total choice of oneself” by arguing against interpretations that emphasize the everyday meaning of the words “choice” and “responsibility,” which leads some to invoke Sartre as a key witness for the total responsibility of actors for their antisemitic attitudes. On the contrary, this article argues that antisemitism, if one takes Sartre’s decisionist theory of freedom seriously, mutates into a blind, inexplicable, and incomprehensible fate, and that the alleged total responsibility for antisemitism as a mode of “bad faith” (mauvaise foi) turns into total unfreedom.","PeriodicalId":148002,"journal":{"name":"Antisemitism Studies","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antisemitism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/antistud.4.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:This article questions the theoretical background to Jean-Paul Sartre’s thesis, formulated in Anti-Semite and Jew, that antisemitism is “a free and total choice of oneself” by arguing against interpretations that emphasize the everyday meaning of the words “choice” and “responsibility,” which leads some to invoke Sartre as a key witness for the total responsibility of actors for their antisemitic attitudes. On the contrary, this article argues that antisemitism, if one takes Sartre’s decisionist theory of freedom seriously, mutates into a blind, inexplicable, and incomprehensible fate, and that the alleged total responsibility for antisemitism as a mode of “bad faith” (mauvaise foi) turns into total unfreedom.
自由的痛苦:萨特的存在主义是反犹主义理论的恰当基础吗?
摘要:本文质疑让-保罗·萨特在《反犹与犹太人》中提出的反犹主义是“一种自由和完全的自我选择”的理论背景,反对强调“选择”和“责任”这两个词的日常含义的解释,这导致一些人援引萨特作为行动者对其反犹主义态度负有全部责任的关键证人。相反,本文认为,如果人们认真对待萨特的自由决定论理论,反犹主义就会变异成一种盲目的、无法解释的、不可理解的命运,而所谓的反犹主义作为一种“恶意”模式(mauvaise foi)的全部责任就会变成完全的不自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信