Obstacle Factors For Legal Protection Of Nike Brand Holders

Doni Prasetio, Anisyah Yunita
{"title":"Obstacle Factors For Legal Protection Of Nike Brand Holders","authors":"Doni Prasetio, Anisyah Yunita","doi":"10.31328/wy.v6i1.3870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existence of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights as an institution in the registration of trademarks and the Department of Industry and Trade as a supervisory agency in the circulation of goods in Indonesia and needs to be optimized related to the functions of supervision, guidance and enforcement. This is done because the functions of supervision, guidance and prosecution are not optimal for traders who sell counterfeit goods. This study aims to determine the factors that hinder the implementation of legal protection for Nike trademark holders on counterfeit shoes in the Klithikan Pakuncen market in Yogyakarta. This research was normative-empirical research using primary data and secondary data. The results of the study show that there are three inhibiting factors for the implementation of legal protection, namely the Law Factor, the Government Factor, and the Community Factor. First, Law no. 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications does not explicitly regulate the Mark Holder but regulates the goods of the brand. Second, the Department of Industry and Commerce and the Ministry of Law and Human Rights are still lacking in personnel or expert staff in the field of trademarks within the Department of Industry and Commerce recognized as an obstacle in the process of fostering or socializing business actors who cheat in the trading process which is considered not only detrimental to the Trademark Rights Holder but also including the consumers in it. Third, consumers or buyers who prefer imitation brand goods at low prices for the sake of a lifestyle.","PeriodicalId":106813,"journal":{"name":"Widya Yuridika","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Widya Yuridika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v6i1.3870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existence of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights as an institution in the registration of trademarks and the Department of Industry and Trade as a supervisory agency in the circulation of goods in Indonesia and needs to be optimized related to the functions of supervision, guidance and enforcement. This is done because the functions of supervision, guidance and prosecution are not optimal for traders who sell counterfeit goods. This study aims to determine the factors that hinder the implementation of legal protection for Nike trademark holders on counterfeit shoes in the Klithikan Pakuncen market in Yogyakarta. This research was normative-empirical research using primary data and secondary data. The results of the study show that there are three inhibiting factors for the implementation of legal protection, namely the Law Factor, the Government Factor, and the Community Factor. First, Law no. 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications does not explicitly regulate the Mark Holder but regulates the goods of the brand. Second, the Department of Industry and Commerce and the Ministry of Law and Human Rights are still lacking in personnel or expert staff in the field of trademarks within the Department of Industry and Commerce recognized as an obstacle in the process of fostering or socializing business actors who cheat in the trading process which is considered not only detrimental to the Trademark Rights Holder but also including the consumers in it. Third, consumers or buyers who prefer imitation brand goods at low prices for the sake of a lifestyle.
耐克品牌持有人法律保护的障碍因素
法律和人权部作为商标注册的一个机构,工业和贸易部作为印度尼西亚商品流通的监督机构,在监督、指导和执行职能方面需要加以优化。这是因为监管、指导和起诉的职能对销售假冒商品的商人来说并不理想。本研究旨在确定阻碍耐克商标持有人在日惹Klithikan Pakuncen市场对假冒鞋实施法律保护的因素。本研究采用一手数据和二次数据相结合的规范实证研究。研究结果表明,法律保护实施的制约因素有三个,即法律因素、政府因素和社区因素。第一,法律没有。关于商标和地理标志的2016年第20号法令没有明确规定商标持有人,而是规定了品牌的商品。第二,工商局和法律和人权部仍然缺乏工商局商标领域的人员或专业人员,这被认为是培养或社会化在交易过程中作弊的商业行为者过程中的障碍,这不仅对商标权持有人有害,而且对消费者也有害。第三,消费者或买家为了一种生活方式而喜欢低价的仿制品牌商品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信