Review on the Applications of Apparent Mean Shape Factor on the Integration of Coarse and Fine PSDs Measured by Different Techniques: Quartz Example

Ugur Ulusoy, M. Yekeler, O. Y. Gülsoy, N. Aydogan, C. Biçer, Z. Gülsoy
{"title":"Review on the Applications of Apparent Mean Shape Factor on the Integration of Coarse and Fine PSDs Measured by Different Techniques: Quartz Example","authors":"Ugur Ulusoy, M. Yekeler, O. Y. Gülsoy, N. Aydogan, C. Biçer, Z. Gülsoy","doi":"10.22606/cwimp.2019.11004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most industry where grinding is utilized, particle size, which is a decisive element in establishing the productivity of production processes and execution of the end product, is analyzed to describe the size distribution of particles in a given sample. In mineral and coal processing, particle size distributions (PSDs) of particulate materials were traditionally accomplished by sieving, which gives inaccurate particle size and PSD below 38 μm. This paper reviews the studies related to the combinations PSDs of different mill products of the same quartz mineral by using different particle size measurement techniques to build the whole PSDs including coarse and fine PSDs. For this purpose, almost pure quartz mineral (which is the most suitable brittle material that gives first order grinding kinetics) ground by ball and rod mill products that are the most widely used conventional mills in mineral processing were measured by different size analysis techniques, i.e. sieving for coarse sizes, Andreasen pipette sedimentation, and laser diffraction for fine sizes below 38 μm and combined them to construct whole size distribution by using apparent mean shape factor, r. The results were satisfactorily well for both cases; PSDs by laser diffraction size distributionsieving and PSDs by Andreasen pipette sedimentation-sieving, i.e., a smooth overlap of corrected laser diffraction and sieving PSDs and Andreasen pipette sedimentation and sieving PSDs were obtained by applying to the particle size distribution with r shifting to the right side of the curves. In the case of determination of PSDs by laser diffraction and sieving, r values determined from the corrected particle size distributions were found to be 1.29 and 1.25 for ball and rod milled products, respectively. The results indicates that there is not significant differences between the shape factors of ball and rod milled products of quartz mineral, i.e. both of them have irregular particles, which deviates from the spherical shape as proved by their SEM microphotographs. On the other hand, for the PSDs by Andreasen pipette sedimentation and sieving, the corrected sedimentation data came closer to the sieving data. It was found that r values determined from the corrected PSDs of the same quartz mineral ground by ball and rod mill were 1.00 and 1.12, respectively. The results show that the rod milled products were not more regular in shape than ball milled products as evidenced by SEM pictures and previous works. Thus, this approach can be utilized for the integration of PSDs analyzed by different techniques for coarse and fine sizes of fine particulate coals, minerals, and similar materials ground finely.","PeriodicalId":282007,"journal":{"name":"Current Works in Mineral Processing","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Works in Mineral Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22606/cwimp.2019.11004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In most industry where grinding is utilized, particle size, which is a decisive element in establishing the productivity of production processes and execution of the end product, is analyzed to describe the size distribution of particles in a given sample. In mineral and coal processing, particle size distributions (PSDs) of particulate materials were traditionally accomplished by sieving, which gives inaccurate particle size and PSD below 38 μm. This paper reviews the studies related to the combinations PSDs of different mill products of the same quartz mineral by using different particle size measurement techniques to build the whole PSDs including coarse and fine PSDs. For this purpose, almost pure quartz mineral (which is the most suitable brittle material that gives first order grinding kinetics) ground by ball and rod mill products that are the most widely used conventional mills in mineral processing were measured by different size analysis techniques, i.e. sieving for coarse sizes, Andreasen pipette sedimentation, and laser diffraction for fine sizes below 38 μm and combined them to construct whole size distribution by using apparent mean shape factor, r. The results were satisfactorily well for both cases; PSDs by laser diffraction size distributionsieving and PSDs by Andreasen pipette sedimentation-sieving, i.e., a smooth overlap of corrected laser diffraction and sieving PSDs and Andreasen pipette sedimentation and sieving PSDs were obtained by applying to the particle size distribution with r shifting to the right side of the curves. In the case of determination of PSDs by laser diffraction and sieving, r values determined from the corrected particle size distributions were found to be 1.29 and 1.25 for ball and rod milled products, respectively. The results indicates that there is not significant differences between the shape factors of ball and rod milled products of quartz mineral, i.e. both of them have irregular particles, which deviates from the spherical shape as proved by their SEM microphotographs. On the other hand, for the PSDs by Andreasen pipette sedimentation and sieving, the corrected sedimentation data came closer to the sieving data. It was found that r values determined from the corrected PSDs of the same quartz mineral ground by ball and rod mill were 1.00 and 1.12, respectively. The results show that the rod milled products were not more regular in shape than ball milled products as evidenced by SEM pictures and previous works. Thus, this approach can be utilized for the integration of PSDs analyzed by different techniques for coarse and fine sizes of fine particulate coals, minerals, and similar materials ground finely.
表观平均形状因子在不同技术测量粗、细psd积分中的应用综述:以石英为例
在大多数使用研磨的工业中,粒度是建立生产过程生产率和最终产品执行的决定性因素,通过分析来描述给定样品中颗粒的粒度分布。在矿物和煤炭加工中,传统的颗粒物料粒度分布(PSD)是通过筛分来实现的,其粒度不准确,PSD小于38 μm。本文综述了采用不同粒度测量技术对同一石英矿物进行不同磨矿产品组合psd的相关研究,构建了包括粗粒psd和细粒psd的整体psd。为此,采用常规磨机中最广泛使用的球磨机和棒磨机磨出的几乎纯石英矿物(最适合提供一级磨动动力学的脆性材料),采用不同粒度分析技术(粗粒度筛分、Andreasen移液沉淀法、38 μm以下细粒度激光衍射法)对其进行了测量,并结合表观平均形状因子构建了整体粒度分布。r.两种情况的结果都令人满意;激光衍射粒度分布-筛分法的psd和Andreasen移液器沉降-筛分法的psd,即将修正后的激光衍射-筛分psd和Andreasen移液器沉降-筛分的psd应用于曲线的右侧,得到了一个平滑的重叠。在通过激光衍射和筛分测定psd的情况下,根据修正的粒度分布确定的r值对于球磨和棒磨产品分别为1.29和1.25。结果表明:石英矿物球磨产品与棒磨产品的形状因子无显著差异,均存在不规则颗粒,其SEM显微照片证明其偏离球形。另一方面,对于Andreasen移液管沉降和筛分的psd,校正后的沉降数据更接近筛分数据。结果表明,同一石英矿物经球磨机和棒磨机研磨后的psd校正后的r值分别为1.00和1.12。结果表明,棒材铣削后的产品形状并不比球磨后的产品更规则。因此,该方法可用于整合不同技术分析的细颗粒煤、矿物和类似细磨材料的粗粒度和细粒度的psd。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信