Vier Thesen zur effektiven Umsetzung der Innenentwicklung in der Schweiz

Gabriela Debrunner, Andreas Hengstermann
{"title":"Vier Thesen zur effektiven Umsetzung der Innenentwicklung in der Schweiz","authors":"Gabriela Debrunner, Andreas Hengstermann","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2023.2229632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Densification is considered a desirable planning solution to prevent urban sprawl and reduce land consumption. The implementation of this goal is acknowledged to come with a range of benefits such as biodiversity preservation, improved energy efficiency, and optimising infrastructure costs. While the need for densification is largely undisputed in the planning debate, the question remains, however, of how to achieve this policy objective. Planning practice is struggling with the implementation of densification objectives because the process implies that stakeholders must deal with the existing built environment, small-scale ownership structures, mosaic of ways, etc. In this paper, we discuss four theses that help explain these implementation difficulties. We take the Swiss spatial planning policy system as a case study example due to its traditionally high priority of densification implementation in Swiss cantons and municipalities. Our four theses suggest different intervention approaches at the federal, cantonal, and local levels to steer and implement densification goals effectively. As well as a clear definition of what ‘densification’ means (and what not), greater financial and personnel support is regarded as being key for municipal planning administrations to effectively resist increasingly professional and legally powerful landowners. English title: Four theses on the effective implementation of densification goals in Switzerland","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"disP - The Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2023.2229632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: Densification is considered a desirable planning solution to prevent urban sprawl and reduce land consumption. The implementation of this goal is acknowledged to come with a range of benefits such as biodiversity preservation, improved energy efficiency, and optimising infrastructure costs. While the need for densification is largely undisputed in the planning debate, the question remains, however, of how to achieve this policy objective. Planning practice is struggling with the implementation of densification objectives because the process implies that stakeholders must deal with the existing built environment, small-scale ownership structures, mosaic of ways, etc. In this paper, we discuss four theses that help explain these implementation difficulties. We take the Swiss spatial planning policy system as a case study example due to its traditionally high priority of densification implementation in Swiss cantons and municipalities. Our four theses suggest different intervention approaches at the federal, cantonal, and local levels to steer and implement densification goals effectively. As well as a clear definition of what ‘densification’ means (and what not), greater financial and personnel support is regarded as being key for municipal planning administrations to effectively resist increasingly professional and legally powerful landowners. English title: Four theses on the effective implementation of densification goals in Switzerland
瑞士的内部发展有效实施模式
摘要:高密度化被认为是防止城市蔓延和减少土地消耗的理想规划解决方案。这一目标的实施被认为会带来一系列好处,如保护生物多样性、提高能源效率和优化基础设施成本。虽然密集化的必要性在规划辩论中基本上是没有争议的,但如何实现这一政策目标的问题仍然存在。规划实践正在努力实现致密化目标,因为这一过程意味着利益相关者必须处理现有的建筑环境、小规模的所有权结构、马赛克方式等。在本文中,我们讨论了四个有助于解释这些实现困难的论文。我们以瑞士的空间规划政策体系作为案例研究的例子,因为它传统上在瑞士各州和直辖市实施高密度化。我们的四篇论文建议在联邦、州和地方各级采取不同的干预方法,以有效地引导和实施致密化目标。除了明确定义“密集化”意味着什么(以及什么不是),更多的财政和人员支持被认为是市政规划管理部门有效抵制日益专业和法律上强大的土地所有者的关键。英文标题:关于瑞士有效实施致密化目标的四篇论文
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信