Establish Reporting Format of Gene Related Rare-Diseases by Exome Sequencing in the Clinical Medical Laboratory

Cheng-Mao Ho, Hsi-Yuan Huang, Chin-An Yang, Ya-Sian Chang, Chien-Yu Lin, Jan-Gowth Chang
{"title":"Establish Reporting Format of Gene Related Rare-Diseases by Exome Sequencing in the Clinical Medical Laboratory","authors":"Cheng-Mao Ho, Hsi-Yuan Huang, Chin-An Yang, Ya-Sian Chang, Chien-Yu Lin, Jan-Gowth Chang","doi":"10.1109/BIBE.2016.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing has two analytical processes, wet bench and bioinformatics process. Exome sequencing covers about 20000 human protein-coding gene sequences. Since these sequences are only 2% of human genome, but can predict 85% of human gene related diseases, whole exome sequencing is the most cost-effective test to diagnose unknown genetic diseases. Methods: Analysis methods developed by the Department of Laboratory Medicine of China Medical University Hospital (CMUH) with compliance of the molecular pathology checklists of the College of American Pathologists (CAP). Results: We developed the exome sequencing analysis workflow. First, single nucleotide polymorphism, SNP known with a minor allele frequency (MAF) >1%, was excluded. Second, variants other than SNP detected by NGS are submitted to the ClinVar database, which divided the relationships between variants and clinical significances into five categories: benign, likely benign, uncertain, likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. Third, all pathogenic variants, also confirmed by Sanger sequencing, might be current clinical relevance or incidental findings. Fourth, uncertain clinical significance variants with a MAF 30% were underwent further analysis by three pathogenicity predictions software: SIFT, PolyPhen, and CADD_PHRED. The final report from of exome sequencing contain sections of summary, clinical relevance (pathogenic), incidental finding (pathogenic), benign/likely benign, GWAS-related diseases, uncertain significance (including the results of three pathogenic software analysis), and the performance of the NGS platform. Conclusions: we demonstrated a reasonable working flow and a clinical practicable reporting format of exome sequencing by NGS.","PeriodicalId":377504,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE.2016.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing has two analytical processes, wet bench and bioinformatics process. Exome sequencing covers about 20000 human protein-coding gene sequences. Since these sequences are only 2% of human genome, but can predict 85% of human gene related diseases, whole exome sequencing is the most cost-effective test to diagnose unknown genetic diseases. Methods: Analysis methods developed by the Department of Laboratory Medicine of China Medical University Hospital (CMUH) with compliance of the molecular pathology checklists of the College of American Pathologists (CAP). Results: We developed the exome sequencing analysis workflow. First, single nucleotide polymorphism, SNP known with a minor allele frequency (MAF) >1%, was excluded. Second, variants other than SNP detected by NGS are submitted to the ClinVar database, which divided the relationships between variants and clinical significances into five categories: benign, likely benign, uncertain, likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. Third, all pathogenic variants, also confirmed by Sanger sequencing, might be current clinical relevance or incidental findings. Fourth, uncertain clinical significance variants with a MAF 30% were underwent further analysis by three pathogenicity predictions software: SIFT, PolyPhen, and CADD_PHRED. The final report from of exome sequencing contain sections of summary, clinical relevance (pathogenic), incidental finding (pathogenic), benign/likely benign, GWAS-related diseases, uncertain significance (including the results of three pathogenic software analysis), and the performance of the NGS platform. Conclusions: we demonstrated a reasonable working flow and a clinical practicable reporting format of exome sequencing by NGS.
建立临床医学实验室外显子组测序的基因相关罕见病报告格式
背景:新一代测序(NGS)检测有湿台式和生物信息学两种分析流程。外显子组测序涵盖了大约20000个人类蛋白质编码基因序列。由于这些序列仅占人类基因组的2%,但可以预测85%的人类基因相关疾病,因此全外显子组测序是诊断未知遗传疾病最具成本效益的方法。方法:参照美国病理学家学会(CAP)分子病理学清单,由中国医科大学附属医院检验医学部制定分析方法。结果:我们建立了外显子组测序分析工作流程。首先,排除了单核苷酸多态性,即已知小等位基因频率(MAF) >1%的SNP。其次,将NGS检测到的SNP以外的变异提交到ClinVar数据库,该数据库将变异与临床意义之间的关系分为良性、可能良性、不确定、可能致病和致病五类。第三,所有致病变异,也被Sanger测序证实,可能是当前临床相关性或偶然发现。第四,MAF为30%的不确定临床意义变异通过三种致病性预测软件:SIFT, PolyPhen和CADD_PHRED进行进一步分析。外显子组测序的最终报告包括总结、临床相关性(致病)、偶然发现(致病)、良性/可能良性、gwas相关疾病、不确定意义(包括三种致病软件分析的结果)和NGS平台的性能。结论:我们展示了一个合理的工作流程和临床实用的NGS外显子组测序报告格式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信