{"title":"Establish Reporting Format of Gene Related Rare-Diseases by Exome Sequencing in the Clinical Medical Laboratory","authors":"Cheng-Mao Ho, Hsi-Yuan Huang, Chin-An Yang, Ya-Sian Chang, Chien-Yu Lin, Jan-Gowth Chang","doi":"10.1109/BIBE.2016.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing has two analytical processes, wet bench and bioinformatics process. Exome sequencing covers about 20000 human protein-coding gene sequences. Since these sequences are only 2% of human genome, but can predict 85% of human gene related diseases, whole exome sequencing is the most cost-effective test to diagnose unknown genetic diseases. Methods: Analysis methods developed by the Department of Laboratory Medicine of China Medical University Hospital (CMUH) with compliance of the molecular pathology checklists of the College of American Pathologists (CAP). Results: We developed the exome sequencing analysis workflow. First, single nucleotide polymorphism, SNP known with a minor allele frequency (MAF) >1%, was excluded. Second, variants other than SNP detected by NGS are submitted to the ClinVar database, which divided the relationships between variants and clinical significances into five categories: benign, likely benign, uncertain, likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. Third, all pathogenic variants, also confirmed by Sanger sequencing, might be current clinical relevance or incidental findings. Fourth, uncertain clinical significance variants with a MAF 30% were underwent further analysis by three pathogenicity predictions software: SIFT, PolyPhen, and CADD_PHRED. The final report from of exome sequencing contain sections of summary, clinical relevance (pathogenic), incidental finding (pathogenic), benign/likely benign, GWAS-related diseases, uncertain significance (including the results of three pathogenic software analysis), and the performance of the NGS platform. Conclusions: we demonstrated a reasonable working flow and a clinical practicable reporting format of exome sequencing by NGS.","PeriodicalId":377504,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE.2016.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing has two analytical processes, wet bench and bioinformatics process. Exome sequencing covers about 20000 human protein-coding gene sequences. Since these sequences are only 2% of human genome, but can predict 85% of human gene related diseases, whole exome sequencing is the most cost-effective test to diagnose unknown genetic diseases. Methods: Analysis methods developed by the Department of Laboratory Medicine of China Medical University Hospital (CMUH) with compliance of the molecular pathology checklists of the College of American Pathologists (CAP). Results: We developed the exome sequencing analysis workflow. First, single nucleotide polymorphism, SNP known with a minor allele frequency (MAF) >1%, was excluded. Second, variants other than SNP detected by NGS are submitted to the ClinVar database, which divided the relationships between variants and clinical significances into five categories: benign, likely benign, uncertain, likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. Third, all pathogenic variants, also confirmed by Sanger sequencing, might be current clinical relevance or incidental findings. Fourth, uncertain clinical significance variants with a MAF 30% were underwent further analysis by three pathogenicity predictions software: SIFT, PolyPhen, and CADD_PHRED. The final report from of exome sequencing contain sections of summary, clinical relevance (pathogenic), incidental finding (pathogenic), benign/likely benign, GWAS-related diseases, uncertain significance (including the results of three pathogenic software analysis), and the performance of the NGS platform. Conclusions: we demonstrated a reasonable working flow and a clinical practicable reporting format of exome sequencing by NGS.