Design and Construction of Chart Evaluating Quantity of Vision in Those Wearing Progressive Addition Lenses

Sahar Bache Sagha, Payam Nabovati, E. Jafarzadehpour
{"title":"Design and Construction of Chart Evaluating Quantity of Vision in Those Wearing Progressive Addition Lenses","authors":"Sahar Bache Sagha, Payam Nabovati, E. Jafarzadehpour","doi":"10.32598/fdj.4.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Currently, there is no standard way to check the optimal fitting of Progressive Addition Lenses (PAL) and visual acuity variations when looking at different objects according to PAL’s production mechanism. We need a standard method to control PAL subjectively according to research on its monitoring. These topics are checked in this study. Methods: Two charts was designed for far and near distances using Persian letters and sentences with a logarithmic scale. Twelve subjects wearing PAL sat at 3 m and 30 cm distances, respectively, from far and near charts, and their visual acuity at Primary Position (Pp) and 15° up and down gazes, and 30° right and left gazes with single and progressive lenses were measured. To evaluate the stability of sharpness, measurements were repeated 5 minutes later. Also, to check the accuracy of vision, the measurements were compared to measurements recorded with a portable Rosenbaum pocket vision screener and E chart. Results: The correlations between Persian and E charts with PAL were confirmed in all gazes except pp. Mean visual acuity in all gazes except pp and 15° up gaze showed the difference in these charts. There are also mean differences in all gazes except 15° down gaze in near vision. Conclusion: Persian and Electronic charts are helpful to evaluate the visual acuity of those wearing PAL and fix the above-mentioned problems.","PeriodicalId":330157,"journal":{"name":"Function and Disability Journal","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Function and Disability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/fdj.4.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Currently, there is no standard way to check the optimal fitting of Progressive Addition Lenses (PAL) and visual acuity variations when looking at different objects according to PAL’s production mechanism. We need a standard method to control PAL subjectively according to research on its monitoring. These topics are checked in this study. Methods: Two charts was designed for far and near distances using Persian letters and sentences with a logarithmic scale. Twelve subjects wearing PAL sat at 3 m and 30 cm distances, respectively, from far and near charts, and their visual acuity at Primary Position (Pp) and 15° up and down gazes, and 30° right and left gazes with single and progressive lenses were measured. To evaluate the stability of sharpness, measurements were repeated 5 minutes later. Also, to check the accuracy of vision, the measurements were compared to measurements recorded with a portable Rosenbaum pocket vision screener and E chart. Results: The correlations between Persian and E charts with PAL were confirmed in all gazes except pp. Mean visual acuity in all gazes except pp and 15° up gaze showed the difference in these charts. There are also mean differences in all gazes except 15° down gaze in near vision. Conclusion: Persian and Electronic charts are helpful to evaluate the visual acuity of those wearing PAL and fix the above-mentioned problems.
渐进式附加镜片视力质量评定表的设计与构建
背景与目的:根据PAL的产生机制,目前还没有标准的方法来检查渐进加法透镜(Progressive Addition Lenses, PAL)在观察不同物体时的最佳拟合和视力变化。根据对PAL监测的研究,需要一种规范的方法来主观上控制PAL。这些主题在本研究中进行了检查。方法:采用波斯字母和句子的对数标度,设计远近两种距离图。12名佩戴PAL的受试者分别在3 m和30 cm的距离上,从远视场和近视场图上,测量他们在主位置(Pp)和15°上下视场以及30°左右视场的视力,分别使用单透镜和渐进透镜。为了评估清晰度的稳定性,5分钟后再次测量。此外,为了检查视觉的准确性,将测量结果与便携式Rosenbaum口袋视觉筛检仪和E图记录的测量结果进行比较。结果:在除pp外的所有凝视中,波斯图和E图与PAL的相关性均得到证实。除pp和15°上视外,所有凝视的平均视力均存在差异。在近视力中,除向下15°凝视外,所有凝视均存在平均差异。结论:波斯图和电子图有助于评价PAL佩戴者的视力,解决上述问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信