New Strategies for Cost Reduction with Depth Correlation in Deepwater Wells

Y. S. Pereira, Raphael Pereira Scudino Borges, E. Schnitzler, Roger Savoldi Roman, Henrique Von Paraski, Alice Claussen Destri, João Almeida Destri, Danilo Signorini Gozzi, C. Baumann, Carlos Merino
{"title":"New Strategies for Cost Reduction with Depth Correlation in Deepwater Wells","authors":"Y. S. Pereira, Raphael Pereira Scudino Borges, E. Schnitzler, Roger Savoldi Roman, Henrique Von Paraski, Alice Claussen Destri, João Almeida Destri, Danilo Signorini Gozzi, C. Baumann, Carlos Merino","doi":"10.4043/29842-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Some completion operation steps, such as perforation and packer seating, require that the degree of uncertainty be limited. The main correlation methods used today are based on tally accuracy, tagging a known element in the well or using wireline gamma ray readings. This paper discusses the development of four alternative depth correlation techniques that aim at avoiding the use of wireline in completion and well testing scenarios. All these methods were implemented in field jobs and demonstrated their efficiency with lower operational cost, higher operational safety and acceptable margin of error for the target job. Two methods are based on gamma ray readings and to send data to surface they use logging while drilling (LWD) and wireless telemetry. Target applications for these two methods are tubing-conveyed perforation (TCP) and well testing operations. The other two methods use casing internal diameter (ID) changes at known depths to determine string depth. One uses a rigid hole-opener to tag a crossover or the top of a liner and the other uses the pressure drop produced by a packer entering into a well section with smaller ID. The main advantages of these new depth correlation techniques are rig time savings and greater operational safety by reducing personnel exposure to dangerous operations.","PeriodicalId":415055,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 29, 2019","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 29, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29842-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Some completion operation steps, such as perforation and packer seating, require that the degree of uncertainty be limited. The main correlation methods used today are based on tally accuracy, tagging a known element in the well or using wireline gamma ray readings. This paper discusses the development of four alternative depth correlation techniques that aim at avoiding the use of wireline in completion and well testing scenarios. All these methods were implemented in field jobs and demonstrated their efficiency with lower operational cost, higher operational safety and acceptable margin of error for the target job. Two methods are based on gamma ray readings and to send data to surface they use logging while drilling (LWD) and wireless telemetry. Target applications for these two methods are tubing-conveyed perforation (TCP) and well testing operations. The other two methods use casing internal diameter (ID) changes at known depths to determine string depth. One uses a rigid hole-opener to tag a crossover or the top of a liner and the other uses the pressure drop produced by a packer entering into a well section with smaller ID. The main advantages of these new depth correlation techniques are rig time savings and greater operational safety by reducing personnel exposure to dangerous operations.
基于深度关联的深水井降成本新策略
一些完井作业步骤,如射孔和封隔器坐封,要求限制不确定性程度。目前使用的主要相关方法是基于计数精度,标记井中的已知元素或使用电缆伽马射线读数。本文讨论了四种替代深度相关技术的发展,旨在避免在完井和试井场景中使用电缆。所有这些方法都在现场作业中得到了实施,并证明了它们的效率,具有更低的作业成本、更高的作业安全性和可接受的误差范围。有两种方法是基于伽马射线读数,并将数据发送到地面,他们使用随钻测井(LWD)和无线遥测技术。这两种方法的目标应用是油管输送射孔(TCP)和试井作业。另外两种方法利用已知深度下套管内径(ID)的变化来确定管柱深度。一种是使用刚性开孔器来标记交叉管或尾管顶部,另一种是使用封隔器进入较小内径的井段产生的压降。这些新的深度相关技术的主要优点是通过减少人员接触危险作业,节省了钻机时间,提高了作业安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信