Antimicrobial Resistance: A Situational Analysis in the Deido Health District, Douala, Cameroon

P. Njukeng, Charles Njumkeng, E. T. Amin, Jane-Francis K. T. Akoachere, P. Njukeng, Charles Njumkeng
{"title":"Antimicrobial Resistance: A Situational Analysis in the Deido Health District, Douala, Cameroon","authors":"P. Njukeng, Charles Njumkeng, E. T. Amin, Jane-Francis K. T. Akoachere, P. Njukeng, Charles Njumkeng","doi":"10.14302/issn.2474-3585.jpmc-21-3851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThe rapid and ongoing spread of antimicrobial-resistant organisms threatens the ability to successfully prevent, control, or treat a growing number of infectious diseases in developed and developing countries. This study was designed to convey more insight on the profile of antimicrobial resistance and the capacity of laboratories conducting antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Cameroon.\n\nMethods\nA multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2019 to March 2020 in the Deido Health District. Laboratories that carry out culture and sensitivity testing within the Deido Health District were identified and assessed to determine their capacity as well as the quality of results from microbiological investigations. Information on antimicrobial susceptibility of various isolates was collected using tablet phones in which the study questionnaires had been incorporated.\n\nResults\nGaps identified in antimicrobial susceptibility testing that cut across laboratories included; insufficient standard operating procedures, inadequate records on personnel training and competency assessment, lack of safety equipment such as biosafety cabinet, stock out and non-participation in external quality assurance program. The turnaround time for antimicrobial susceptibility testing ranged from 3 – 7 days. Out of the 1797 samples cultured, 437(24.3%) had at least one isolate. A total of 15 different isolates were identified with Candida albicans being the most frequent 178 (40.7%), followed by Escherichia coli 80(18.3%). Among the 15 classes of antimicrobial drugs used in this study, the overall resistance of the isolates showed that five classes had class median resistance above 40% (Cephalosporins, Penicillins, Beta-lactam, Macrolides, and Polyenes).\n\nConclusion\nThis study has shown the need to develop a coordinated national approach to fight antimicrobial resistance. Scaling-up of antimicrobial susceptibility testing will, therefore, require strengthening the microbiology units of laboratory systems as well as ensuring the use of laboratory data for decision making","PeriodicalId":200595,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Preventive Medicine And Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Preventive Medicine And Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2474-3585.jpmc-21-3851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background The rapid and ongoing spread of antimicrobial-resistant organisms threatens the ability to successfully prevent, control, or treat a growing number of infectious diseases in developed and developing countries. This study was designed to convey more insight on the profile of antimicrobial resistance and the capacity of laboratories conducting antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Cameroon. Methods A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2019 to March 2020 in the Deido Health District. Laboratories that carry out culture and sensitivity testing within the Deido Health District were identified and assessed to determine their capacity as well as the quality of results from microbiological investigations. Information on antimicrobial susceptibility of various isolates was collected using tablet phones in which the study questionnaires had been incorporated. Results Gaps identified in antimicrobial susceptibility testing that cut across laboratories included; insufficient standard operating procedures, inadequate records on personnel training and competency assessment, lack of safety equipment such as biosafety cabinet, stock out and non-participation in external quality assurance program. The turnaround time for antimicrobial susceptibility testing ranged from 3 – 7 days. Out of the 1797 samples cultured, 437(24.3%) had at least one isolate. A total of 15 different isolates were identified with Candida albicans being the most frequent 178 (40.7%), followed by Escherichia coli 80(18.3%). Among the 15 classes of antimicrobial drugs used in this study, the overall resistance of the isolates showed that five classes had class median resistance above 40% (Cephalosporins, Penicillins, Beta-lactam, Macrolides, and Polyenes). Conclusion This study has shown the need to develop a coordinated national approach to fight antimicrobial resistance. Scaling-up of antimicrobial susceptibility testing will, therefore, require strengthening the microbiology units of laboratory systems as well as ensuring the use of laboratory data for decision making
抗菌素耐药性:喀麦隆杜阿拉Deido卫生区的情况分析
在发达国家和发展中国家,抗微生物药物耐药性生物的快速和持续传播威胁到成功预防、控制或治疗越来越多的传染病的能力。这项研究旨在更深入地了解喀麦隆抗菌素耐药性概况和开展抗菌素药敏试验的实验室的能力。方法于2019年10月至2020年3月在德岛卫生区进行多中心横断面研究。确定并评估了在Deido卫生区内进行培养和敏感性测试的实验室,以确定其能力以及微生物调查结果的质量。采用平板手机收集各菌株的药敏信息,并纳入研究问卷。结果各实验室在抗菌药物敏感性检测中发现的差距包括;标准操作程序不充分,人员培训和能力评估记录不充分,缺乏安全设备,如生物安全柜,缺货和未参与外部质量保证计划。药敏试验的周转时间为3 - 7天。在1797个培养样本中,437个(24.3%)至少有一个分离株。共检出15株不同的分离株,其中以白色念珠菌最为常见,178株(40.7%),其次是大肠杆菌80株(18.3%)。在本研究使用的15类抗菌药物中,总体耐药情况显示,5类(头孢菌素类、青霉素类、β -内酰胺类、大环内酯类和多烯类)的耐药中位数在40%以上。结论本研究表明,有必要制定一种协调一致的国家方法来对抗抗菌素耐药性。因此,扩大抗菌素敏感性测试将需要加强实验室系统的微生物学单位,并确保使用实验室数据进行决策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信