NAEP Scoring of Fourth-Grade Narrative Writing.

Sheida White, Alan Vanneman
{"title":"NAEP Scoring of Fourth-Grade Narrative Writing.","authors":"Sheida White, Alan Vanneman","doi":"10.1037/e314662005-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 1998 Writing Assessment measured student writing performance at the 4th, 8th, and 12th grades. Scoring guides for each grade allowed scorers to objectively evaluate students’ work. This issue of NAEPfacts includes a 4th-grade narrative scoring guide, along with samples of student work at each of six levels of performance on the scoring guide. The NAEP Writing Framework, developed by the National Assessment Governing Board, set six overarching goals for the NAEP 1998 Writing Assessment: • Students should write for a variety of purposes: narrative, informative, and persuasive. • Students should write on a variety of tasks and for many different audiences. • Students should write from a variety of stimulus materials, and within various time constraints. • Students should generate, draft, revise, and edit ideas and forms of expression in their writing. • Students should display effective choices in the organization of their writing. They should include detail to illustrate and elaborate their ideas, and use appropriate conventions of written English. • Students should value writing as a communicative activity. Fourth-graders were given two writing topics, or “prompts,” out of a possible 20 and were given 25 minutes to write on each. Each topic was classified according to purpose as either narrative, informative, or persuasive. Three 4th-grade topics have been released to the public. Scoring guides were developed for each writing purpose. The guides established six levels of student performance for each writing purpose, ranging from “Unsatisfactory” to “Excellent.” This issue of NAEPfacts includes the complete text of the 4thgrade “narrative” scoring guide on page two, the complete text of a narrative prompt asking students to write a story about a magic castle, examples of student writing at each of the six levels in response to the “magic castle” prompt, and a discussion of how the scoring guide applies to the six student writing samples. Focused Holistic Scoring The scorers of the NAEP 1998 writing assessment used a scoring method described as “focused holistic scoring.” This approach combines holistic and “primary trait” scoring. A strict holistic approach to the scoring of writing treats a writing task as a “springboard” for writing. A particular writing task is given to students as a stimulus to engage them and inspire them to write, and students’ responses are scored in terms of the overall writing quality. The “primary trait” method of scoring writing, on the other hand, is concerned with how well students respond to a specific topic. For example, if students are asked to write about whether they like adventure movies, students who do not address the topic of","PeriodicalId":252919,"journal":{"name":"Education Statistics Quarterly","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Statistics Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e314662005-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 1998 Writing Assessment measured student writing performance at the 4th, 8th, and 12th grades. Scoring guides for each grade allowed scorers to objectively evaluate students’ work. This issue of NAEPfacts includes a 4th-grade narrative scoring guide, along with samples of student work at each of six levels of performance on the scoring guide. The NAEP Writing Framework, developed by the National Assessment Governing Board, set six overarching goals for the NAEP 1998 Writing Assessment: • Students should write for a variety of purposes: narrative, informative, and persuasive. • Students should write on a variety of tasks and for many different audiences. • Students should write from a variety of stimulus materials, and within various time constraints. • Students should generate, draft, revise, and edit ideas and forms of expression in their writing. • Students should display effective choices in the organization of their writing. They should include detail to illustrate and elaborate their ideas, and use appropriate conventions of written English. • Students should value writing as a communicative activity. Fourth-graders were given two writing topics, or “prompts,” out of a possible 20 and were given 25 minutes to write on each. Each topic was classified according to purpose as either narrative, informative, or persuasive. Three 4th-grade topics have been released to the public. Scoring guides were developed for each writing purpose. The guides established six levels of student performance for each writing purpose, ranging from “Unsatisfactory” to “Excellent.” This issue of NAEPfacts includes the complete text of the 4thgrade “narrative” scoring guide on page two, the complete text of a narrative prompt asking students to write a story about a magic castle, examples of student writing at each of the six levels in response to the “magic castle” prompt, and a discussion of how the scoring guide applies to the six student writing samples. Focused Holistic Scoring The scorers of the NAEP 1998 writing assessment used a scoring method described as “focused holistic scoring.” This approach combines holistic and “primary trait” scoring. A strict holistic approach to the scoring of writing treats a writing task as a “springboard” for writing. A particular writing task is given to students as a stimulus to engage them and inspire them to write, and students’ responses are scored in terms of the overall writing quality. The “primary trait” method of scoring writing, on the other hand, is concerned with how well students respond to a specific topic. For example, if students are asked to write about whether they like adventure movies, students who do not address the topic of
四年级叙事写作NAEP评分。
国家教育进步评估(NAEP) 1998年的写作评估衡量了4年级、8年级和12年级学生的写作成绩。每个年级的评分指南允许评分者客观地评价学生的工作。本期NAEPfacts包括四年级叙事评分指南,以及评分指南上六个级别中每个级别的学生作业样本。NAEP写作框架,由国家评估管理委员会制定,为NAEP 1998写作评估设定了六个总体目标:•学生应该为各种目的写作:叙事性,知识性和说服力。•学生应该写各种各样的任务和许多不同的读者。•学生应该根据各种刺激材料,在不同的时间限制内写作。•学生应该在写作中产生、起草、修改和编辑思想和表达形式。•学生应该在他们的写作组织中展示有效的选择。他们应该包括细节来说明和阐述他们的想法,并使用适当的书面英语惯例。•学生应该重视写作作为一种交际活动。四年级学生从可能的20个写作题目中选出两个题目或“提示”,每个题目有25分钟的写作时间。每个主题都根据目的分为叙述性、知识性或说服性。四年级的三个主题已经向公众发布。为每个写作目的制定了评分指南。该指南为每个写作目的建立了六个级别的学生表现,从“不满意”到“优秀”。本期NAEPfacts包括第二页四年级“叙事”评分指南的完整文本,要求学生写一个关于魔法城堡的故事的叙事提示的完整文本,学生在回答“魔法城堡”提示的六个级别中每个级别的写作示例,以及如何将评分指南应用于六个学生写作样本的讨论。NAEP 1998写作评估的评分者使用了一种被称为“集中整体评分”的评分方法。这种方法结合了整体和“主要特征”评分。严格的整体评分方法将写作任务视为写作的“跳板”。给学生一个特定的写作任务,作为一个刺激,让他们参与并激励他们写作,学生的回答是根据整体写作质量来评分的。另一方面,写作评分的“主要特征”方法关注的是学生对特定主题的反应。例如,如果学生被要求写他们是否喜欢冒险电影,没有回答这个话题的学生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信