Privacy Protection, Risk Attitudes, and the Need for Control: An Experimental Study

Alisa Frik, Alexia Gaudeul
{"title":"Privacy Protection, Risk Attitudes, and the Need for Control: An Experimental Study","authors":"Alisa Frik, Alexia Gaudeul","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2743639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We expose subjects in our experiment to the risk of having to reveal private information to other participants. We show that the decision to incur this risk is driven mainly by their general attitude to monetary risk. Survey attitudes to privacy play only a marginal role in explaining attitudes to privacy risk. Subjects who are more willing to pay or to accept payment for their private information do not appear to be more or less likely to incur privacy risks than others once their overall level of risk aversion is taken into account. We further test the relation between privacy and control, that is, whether depriving subjects of full control over whether their personal information will be revealed leads them to lose interest in protecting it. We find that this is not the case. We finally find that subjects who are asked for their preferences over monetary risk before being asked for their preferences over privacy risks tend to choose riskier options in privacy lotteries. This provides evidence of the importance of framing for privacy decisions; inducing subjects to think of privacy decisions in the context of financial decisions reduces their aversion to privacy risk.","PeriodicalId":179517,"journal":{"name":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2743639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We expose subjects in our experiment to the risk of having to reveal private information to other participants. We show that the decision to incur this risk is driven mainly by their general attitude to monetary risk. Survey attitudes to privacy play only a marginal role in explaining attitudes to privacy risk. Subjects who are more willing to pay or to accept payment for their private information do not appear to be more or less likely to incur privacy risks than others once their overall level of risk aversion is taken into account. We further test the relation between privacy and control, that is, whether depriving subjects of full control over whether their personal information will be revealed leads them to lose interest in protecting it. We find that this is not the case. We finally find that subjects who are asked for their preferences over monetary risk before being asked for their preferences over privacy risks tend to choose riskier options in privacy lotteries. This provides evidence of the importance of framing for privacy decisions; inducing subjects to think of privacy decisions in the context of financial decisions reduces their aversion to privacy risk.
隐私保护、风险态度和控制需求:一项实验研究
我们让实验对象面临向其他参与者透露私人信息的风险。我们表明,承担这种风险的决定主要是由他们对货币风险的总体态度所驱动的。调查对隐私的态度在解释对隐私风险的态度方面只起着边缘作用。一旦考虑到他们的整体风险厌恶水平,那些更愿意为他们的私人信息付费或接受付费的研究对象似乎并不比其他人更容易或更少地承担隐私风险。我们进一步检验隐私与控制之间的关系,即剥夺主体对其个人信息是否会被披露的完全控制权是否会导致其失去保护隐私的兴趣。我们发现情况并非如此。我们最终发现,在被问及对隐私风险的偏好之前,被问及对货币风险的偏好的受试者倾向于在隐私彩票中选择风险更高的选项。这证明了框架对隐私决策的重要性;诱导受试者在财务决策的背景下考虑隐私决策可以降低他们对隐私风险的厌恶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信