FED’İN PARA POLİTİKALARININ KIRILGAN BEŞLİ ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNDE YAYILMA ETKİLERİ: PANEL VAR YAKLAŞIMI İLE MODELLEME

Saltuk Ağiralioğlu
{"title":"FED’İN PARA POLİTİKALARININ KIRILGAN BEŞLİ ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNDE YAYILMA ETKİLERİ: PANEL VAR YAKLAŞIMI İLE MODELLEME","authors":"Saltuk Ağiralioğlu","doi":"10.14784/MARUFACD.879148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After he 2008 Global Crisis, the FED implemented unconventional monetary policies along with conventional monetary policies. FED policies are generally thought to have spillover effects on emerging market economies. This article compare effects of FED monetary policies between January 2008 – December 2019 on fragile five countries’(Brazil, India, Indonesia, South Africa and Turkey) two-year bond yields stock prices and exchange rates with panel VAR model. The monetary policies implemented by the FED between 2008-2019 have been analyzed in three sub-periods as the 2008-2012 QE (Quantitative Easing) period, the 2013-2015 Tapering period (reduction of bond purchases) and the 2016-2019 normalization period. It has been revealed that the non-traditional monetary policies implemented by the FED between 2008-2019 are more effective than traditional policies. This difference was even greater between 2008-2012. It has been observed that unconventional monetary policies initially led to a depreciation and then an increase in the exchange rates of fragile five countries. It has been observed that conventional and unconventional monetary policies in 2008-2012 period have a much more impact on the stock market index, exchange rates and bond interests than the other two periods. Tapering announcements between 2013-2015 caused the effect of monetary policies to diminish and to change direction, although the expansion of FED balance sheet continued. In the normalization period it was observed that the interest rate hike and the tightening of the FED balance sheet did not have as strong effects as in the QE period.","PeriodicalId":440701,"journal":{"name":"Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi","volume":"193 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14784/MARUFACD.879148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

After he 2008 Global Crisis, the FED implemented unconventional monetary policies along with conventional monetary policies. FED policies are generally thought to have spillover effects on emerging market economies. This article compare effects of FED monetary policies between January 2008 – December 2019 on fragile five countries’(Brazil, India, Indonesia, South Africa and Turkey) two-year bond yields stock prices and exchange rates with panel VAR model. The monetary policies implemented by the FED between 2008-2019 have been analyzed in three sub-periods as the 2008-2012 QE (Quantitative Easing) period, the 2013-2015 Tapering period (reduction of bond purchases) and the 2016-2019 normalization period. It has been revealed that the non-traditional monetary policies implemented by the FED between 2008-2019 are more effective than traditional policies. This difference was even greater between 2008-2012. It has been observed that unconventional monetary policies initially led to a depreciation and then an increase in the exchange rates of fragile five countries. It has been observed that conventional and unconventional monetary policies in 2008-2012 period have a much more impact on the stock market index, exchange rates and bond interests than the other two periods. Tapering announcements between 2013-2015 caused the effect of monetary policies to diminish and to change direction, although the expansion of FED balance sheet continued. In the normalization period it was observed that the interest rate hike and the tightening of the FED balance sheet did not have as strong effects as in the QE period.
2008年全球金融危机后,美联储在实施常规货币政策的同时实施了非常规货币政策。人们普遍认为,美联储的政策会对新兴市场经济体产生溢出效应。本文采用面板VAR模型比较了2008年1月至2019年12月美联储货币政策对脆弱五国(巴西、印度、印度尼西亚、南非和土耳其)两年期债券收益率、股价和汇率的影响。美联储在2008年至2019年期间实施的货币政策被分为三个时期进行分析,分别是2008年至2012年的量化宽松时期、2013年至2015年的逐步缩减时期(减少债券购买)和2016年至2019年的正常化时期。有研究表明,2008-2019年美联储实施的非传统货币政策比传统政策更有效。在2008年至2012年期间,这种差异甚至更大。人们观察到,非常规货币政策最初导致脆弱的五个国家的汇率贬值,然后又上升。我们观察到,2008-2012年期间的常规货币政策和非常规货币政策对股市指数、汇率和债券利率的影响远大于其他两个时期。2013年至2015年期间的量化宽松声明导致货币政策的效果减弱并改变了方向,尽管美联储资产负债表的扩张仍在继续。在正常化时期,人们观察到,加息和美联储收紧资产负债表的效果不如量化宽松时期那么强烈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信