Free and Determined: Questions of Agency in The Road and The Star Rover

Kenneth K. Brandt
{"title":"Free and Determined: Questions of Agency in The Road and The Star Rover","authors":"Kenneth K. Brandt","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9780746312964.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the ways in which London frequently represents the interplay of freedom and determinism in his work. The analysis focuses primarily on The Road, his tramp memoir, and The Star Rover, his prison novel and discusses how these novels address issues of agency. Most often, London posits that a viable category of agency exists and that a degree of moral responsibility is defensible; however, the degree of freedom and level of accountability he most consistently portrays are notably limited. Though his views on agency were not static, London most frequently dramatizes a position in the free will-determinism debate that resembles a compatibilistic view of free will. For London, the complexly muddled and inevitable intermingling of (often unconscious) deterministic factors with unimpeded conscious choices diminishes the cogency of the compatibilist position; yet, at the same time, he is unwilling to completely dismiss compatibilism because it presents a means to understand—and possibly to most fully realize—the widest range of whatever freedoms may be available. These tensions are central to the themes and conflicts in The Road and The Star Rover, where London explores the coexistence of free will and determinism.","PeriodicalId":322102,"journal":{"name":"Jack London","volume":"6 1-2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jack London","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9780746312964.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter discusses the ways in which London frequently represents the interplay of freedom and determinism in his work. The analysis focuses primarily on The Road, his tramp memoir, and The Star Rover, his prison novel and discusses how these novels address issues of agency. Most often, London posits that a viable category of agency exists and that a degree of moral responsibility is defensible; however, the degree of freedom and level of accountability he most consistently portrays are notably limited. Though his views on agency were not static, London most frequently dramatizes a position in the free will-determinism debate that resembles a compatibilistic view of free will. For London, the complexly muddled and inevitable intermingling of (often unconscious) deterministic factors with unimpeded conscious choices diminishes the cogency of the compatibilist position; yet, at the same time, he is unwilling to completely dismiss compatibilism because it presents a means to understand—and possibly to most fully realize—the widest range of whatever freedoms may be available. These tensions are central to the themes and conflicts in The Road and The Star Rover, where London explores the coexistence of free will and determinism.
自由与决定:《道路》与《星际漫游》中的代理问题
本章讨论了伦敦在他的作品中经常表现自由和决定论的相互作用的方式。分析主要集中在他的流浪汉回忆录《路》和监狱小说《星际漫游者》上,并讨论这些小说是如何解决代理问题的。大多数情况下,伦敦假定存在一种可行的代理类别,一定程度的道德责任是可以辩护的;然而,他一贯描绘的自由程度和问责程度明显有限。虽然他对能动性的看法不是一成不变的,但伦敦在自由意志与决定论的辩论中最频繁地表现出一种类似于自由意志相容观的立场。对伦敦来说,(通常是无意识的)确定性因素与不受阻碍的有意识选择复杂而混乱且不可避免地交织在一起,削弱了相容主义立场的说服力;然而,与此同时,他又不愿意完全摒弃相容主义,因为它提供了一种理解——可能是最充分地实现——任何可能存在的自由的最广泛范围的方法。这些紧张关系是《道路》和《星际漫游者》的主题和冲突的核心,伦敦在其中探索了自由意志和决定论的共存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信