A comparative study on sustainability assessment level (BREEAM, LEED, and Estidama) to develop better environment sustainability assessment

Raghad Mourad, J. Wahid
{"title":"A comparative study on sustainability assessment level (BREEAM, LEED, and Estidama) to develop better environment sustainability assessment","authors":"Raghad Mourad, J. Wahid","doi":"10.56294/saludcyt2022237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The terms \"Sustainability\" and \"Green Building\" have become concepts of widespread interest. As a result, the research and development of sustainability standards and rating systems became an international trend. This paper evaluated three sustainability assessment standards to develop an overall assessment standard that can be applied worldwide. BREEAM, LEED, and Estidama were chosen as standards, and a scoring system for the developed method was proposed. A proposed assessment method (PAM) was developed with the following factors: energy (23%), water (15%), materials (15%), indoor quality (14%), land use, ecology, and management (10%), outdoor quality (9%), and finally innovation (4%).","PeriodicalId":184806,"journal":{"name":"Salud Ciencia y Tecnología","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Ciencia y Tecnología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2022237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The terms "Sustainability" and "Green Building" have become concepts of widespread interest. As a result, the research and development of sustainability standards and rating systems became an international trend. This paper evaluated three sustainability assessment standards to develop an overall assessment standard that can be applied worldwide. BREEAM, LEED, and Estidama were chosen as standards, and a scoring system for the developed method was proposed. A proposed assessment method (PAM) was developed with the following factors: energy (23%), water (15%), materials (15%), indoor quality (14%), land use, ecology, and management (10%), outdoor quality (9%), and finally innovation (4%).
可持续性评估水平(BREEAM、LEED和Estidama)的比较研究,以制定更好的环境可持续性评估
“可持续发展”和“绿色建筑”已经成为人们广泛关注的概念。因此,可持续发展标准和评级体系的研究和发展成为一种国际趋势。本文对三个可持续发展评价标准进行了综合评价,以期形成一个适用于全球的综合评价标准。以BREEAM、LEED和Estidama为标准,提出了一套评分体系。基于能源(23%)、水(15%)、材料(15%)、室内质量(14%)、土地利用、生态和管理(10%)、室外质量(9%)和创新(4%),提出了一种评估方法(PAM)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信