Comparative Analysis of Local Community Protection Mechanisms in Kosovo and North Macedonia

Artan Binaku, Memet Memeti
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Local Community Protection Mechanisms in Kosovo and North Macedonia","authors":"Artan Binaku, Memet Memeti","doi":"10.2478/seeur-2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The objective of this paper is to provide a comparative analysis of local community protection mechanisms in Kosovo and North Macedonia. The intention is to comparatively analyze the community protection mechanism’s differences and similarities and their establishment in both countries. Requirements on community protection mechanisms as tools for ensuring community rights will be elaborated with two institutional settings and succinct legal infrastructure. The establishment of the community-led mechanisms debate has been increasingly conductive to Kosovo and North Macedonia since the inter-ethnic conflicts that these two states were involved in. For that particular reason, Kosovo and North Macedonia have initiated the design of community protection mechanisms to foster inter-community communication, tension easing, and serving as a means and tool for communities’ inclusiveness in local and central institutional affairs. In doing this analysis, two primary legal documents in Kosovo and North Macedonia, the proposed plan settlement of the former United Nations special envoy Martii Ahtisaari in Kosovo and the Ohrid Framework Agreement in North Macedonia, will lead to conclusive comparative findings. Further, the comparative analysis will extend to elaborating Kosovo’s and North Macedonia’s legislative framework, such as their constitutions, community protection laws, and local governance legislation. The importance of the paper also extends to comparing the community protection mechanisms between two countries in finding potential differences and parities between the community protection mechanisms in Kosovo and North Macedonia. Finally, the analysis will provide a theoretical understanding of the local community protection mechanisms framework, focusing on establishing community protection mechanisms, legal requirements, and successes these mechanisms have brought to both countries’ institutional settings.","PeriodicalId":332987,"journal":{"name":"SEEU Review","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEEU Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2021-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this paper is to provide a comparative analysis of local community protection mechanisms in Kosovo and North Macedonia. The intention is to comparatively analyze the community protection mechanism’s differences and similarities and their establishment in both countries. Requirements on community protection mechanisms as tools for ensuring community rights will be elaborated with two institutional settings and succinct legal infrastructure. The establishment of the community-led mechanisms debate has been increasingly conductive to Kosovo and North Macedonia since the inter-ethnic conflicts that these two states were involved in. For that particular reason, Kosovo and North Macedonia have initiated the design of community protection mechanisms to foster inter-community communication, tension easing, and serving as a means and tool for communities’ inclusiveness in local and central institutional affairs. In doing this analysis, two primary legal documents in Kosovo and North Macedonia, the proposed plan settlement of the former United Nations special envoy Martii Ahtisaari in Kosovo and the Ohrid Framework Agreement in North Macedonia, will lead to conclusive comparative findings. Further, the comparative analysis will extend to elaborating Kosovo’s and North Macedonia’s legislative framework, such as their constitutions, community protection laws, and local governance legislation. The importance of the paper also extends to comparing the community protection mechanisms between two countries in finding potential differences and parities between the community protection mechanisms in Kosovo and North Macedonia. Finally, the analysis will provide a theoretical understanding of the local community protection mechanisms framework, focusing on establishing community protection mechanisms, legal requirements, and successes these mechanisms have brought to both countries’ institutional settings.
科索沃与北马其顿地方社区保护机制的比较分析
摘要本文的目的是对科索沃和北马其顿当地社区保护机制进行比较分析。本文的目的是比较分析两国社区保护机制的异同以及两国社区保护机制的建立。将以两种体制设置和简洁的法律基础设施阐述社区保护机制作为确保社区权利工具的要求。自科索沃和北马其顿卷入种族间冲突以来,建立社区主导的辩论机制对这两个国家越来越有帮助。出于这一特殊原因,科索沃和北马其顿开始设计社区保护机制,以促进社区间的沟通,缓和紧张局势,并作为社区在地方和中央机构事务中的包容性的手段和工具。在进行这一分析时,科索沃和北马其顿的两个主要法律文件,即联合国前特使马蒂·阿赫蒂萨里在科索沃的拟议解决计划和北马其顿的奥赫里德框架协定,将导致结论性的比较结果。此外,比较分析将扩展到详细阐述科索沃和北马其顿的立法框架,例如其宪法、社区保护法和地方治理立法。本文的重要性还延伸到比较两国之间的社区保护机制,以发现科索沃和北马其顿社区保护机制之间的潜在差异和差异。最后,分析将对当地社区保护机制框架进行理论理解,重点是建立社区保护机制、法律要求以及这些机制为两国的制度设置带来的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信