Assessing ideational and evaluative skills and creative styles and attitudes

M. Runco, M. Basadur
{"title":"Assessing ideational and evaluative skills and creative styles and attitudes","authors":"M. Runco, M. Basadur","doi":"10.1109/IEMC.1990.201291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors describe the rationale for the multiphase creative problem solving process, and report the finding of an empirical investigation conducted to facilitate the problem solving of managers (N=35). The ideational skills of the managers were assessed before and after training in the creative problem solving process, along with their attitudes about creative ideation, cognitive style (i.e. optimizer, generator, conceptualizer, or implementor), and evaluative skill (i.e. ability to recognize original ideas). The managers were significantly more accurate in their judgments after training, both in their identification of original ideas and recognition of unoriginal ideas. After training, the managers also gave more solutions and more original solutions to problems faced. Several variables (e.g. the preference for ideation attitude and an implementor cognitive style) seemed to moderate the impact of training, which was therefore effective, with specific effects predictable from pretraining individual differences in attitudes and cognitive style.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":235761,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Engineering Management, Gaining the Competitive Advantage","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"117","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Engineering Management, Gaining the Competitive Advantage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.1990.201291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 117

Abstract

The authors describe the rationale for the multiphase creative problem solving process, and report the finding of an empirical investigation conducted to facilitate the problem solving of managers (N=35). The ideational skills of the managers were assessed before and after training in the creative problem solving process, along with their attitudes about creative ideation, cognitive style (i.e. optimizer, generator, conceptualizer, or implementor), and evaluative skill (i.e. ability to recognize original ideas). The managers were significantly more accurate in their judgments after training, both in their identification of original ideas and recognition of unoriginal ideas. After training, the managers also gave more solutions and more original solutions to problems faced. Several variables (e.g. the preference for ideation attitude and an implementor cognitive style) seemed to moderate the impact of training, which was therefore effective, with specific effects predictable from pretraining individual differences in attitudes and cognitive style.<>
评估思想和评估技能以及创造性风格和态度
作者描述了多阶段创造性问题解决过程的基本原理,并报告了一项实证调查的发现,该调查旨在促进管理者解决问题(N=35)。在创造性问题解决过程的培训前后,评估了管理者的创意技能,以及他们对创意的态度、认知风格(即优化者、生成器、概念化者或实施者)和评估技能(即识别原始想法的能力)。经过培训后,管理者在识别原创想法和识别非原创想法方面的判断都明显更加准确。培训后,管理者也对面临的问题给出了更多的解决方案和更新颖的解决方案。几个变量(例如对构思态度的偏好和实施者的认知风格)似乎调节了训练的影响,因此训练是有效的,具体效果可以从训练前态度和认知风格的个体差异中预测出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信