Decadence in Modern Chinese Literature and Culture. A Comparative and Literary-Historical Reevaluation by Hongjian Wang (review)

G. Tamburello
{"title":"Decadence in Modern Chinese Literature and Culture. A Comparative and Literary-Historical Reevaluation by Hongjian Wang (review)","authors":"G. Tamburello","doi":"10.1353/rmr.2023.a904906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and tying up loose ends. Smith then states, “These seemingly random fragments, spliced up and reconstructed, form a new kaleidoscopic pattern that frustrates and disrupts logical consistency, exemplifying Woolf ’s paratactic method more intensely than nearly any of its other manifestations that we have examined” (134). Fragmented details and thoughts are critical when considering Modernist literature, which is why scholars of Joyce, Eliot, and Stein would also appreciate this groundbreaking work.","PeriodicalId":278890,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rocky Mountain Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rmr.2023.a904906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

and tying up loose ends. Smith then states, “These seemingly random fragments, spliced up and reconstructed, form a new kaleidoscopic pattern that frustrates and disrupts logical consistency, exemplifying Woolf ’s paratactic method more intensely than nearly any of its other manifestations that we have examined” (134). Fragmented details and thoughts are critical when considering Modernist literature, which is why scholars of Joyce, Eliot, and Stein would also appreciate this groundbreaking work.
中国现代文学与文化中的颓废。王宏建的比较与文史再评价(述评)
还有收拾残局。史密斯接着说,“这些看似随机的碎片,拼接和重建,形成了一种新的万花千金的模式,挫败和破坏了逻辑一致性,比我们研究过的任何其他表现形式都更强烈地体现了伍尔夫的意合方法”(134)。在考虑现代主义文学时,支离破碎的细节和思想是至关重要的,这就是为什么乔伊斯、艾略特和斯坦的学者也会欣赏这部开创性的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信