The Current State of the Problem of Using Landscape Indicators to Assess Soil and Ground Conditions in the Mountainous Regions of the Chechen Republic

A. Abumuslimov, M. Taisumov, Fazil Alakhverdiyev, I. Abumuslimova
{"title":"The Current State of the Problem of Using Landscape Indicators to Assess Soil and Ground Conditions in the Mountainous Regions of the Chechen Republic","authors":"A. Abumuslimov, M. Taisumov, Fazil Alakhverdiyev, I. Abumuslimova","doi":"10.21467/abstracts.93.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Book DOI: 10.21467/abstracts.93 landscape with the most completeness and accuracy and reveal its relationship with geological and hydrogeological conditions. In aero-landscape indication a certain terminology has been developed. So the object of indication or indicator is called the recipient component for the purpose of which the indication is made. The physiognomic components used for indication are called indicators; as their most often various combinations of relief and vegetation appear, caused by complex or landscape indicators; if relief forms are used for indication, then they are called geomorphological indicators; if the indication is made by plant communities about geobotanical indicators. Among the indicators, direct and indirect ones are distinguished. Direct indicators are those that have a direct relationship with the indicator and depend on its distribution. Indirect indicators are those whose relationship with the indicator is through some intermediate link in the environment. Direct indicators are very stable and change little in different parts of the range, while indirect indicators are usually regional in nature. By the nature of the object, indicative studies conducted in the mountainous areas are divided into hydroindication, pedoindication, lithoindication and indication of minerals. For the practice of agricultural assessment of the territory, pedo-indicator and litho-indicator studies are of the greatest importance. Initially, in the mountainous regions, only a geobotanical indication took place. At the same time, the work had a predominant litho-indicative character. Indication of soils as an independent task was not posed. In most non-indicative works, it was not the relationship between vegetation and soil that was studied, but the relationship between vegetation and rock. The main modern directions in indicator research in mountainous areas are: a) the development of landscape indication when used as indicators of both landforms and their exposure and vegetation; b) the use of landscape indications to determine exogenous processes in the mountains; c) further development of litho-indication and refinement of its methodology. Further development of this area of research in the laboratory and VSEGINGEO methods under the direction of A.V. Sadova led to the formation of a concept according to which the development of exogenous processes in the mountains can be predicted based on landscape indications. In this case, the starting link is the compilation of a landscape map, which is then interpreted for indicative purposes. Interpretation is carried out by identifying which of the selected landscapes are characterized by certain exogenous processes. This identification is carried out by studying in the field key areas selected within different landscapes, as well as by viewing aerial photographs and fixing manifestations of various processes on them.","PeriodicalId":176768,"journal":{"name":"Abstracts of The Second Eurasian RISK-2020 Conference and Symposium","volume":"835 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abstracts of The Second Eurasian RISK-2020 Conference and Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21467/abstracts.93.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Book DOI: 10.21467/abstracts.93 landscape with the most completeness and accuracy and reveal its relationship with geological and hydrogeological conditions. In aero-landscape indication a certain terminology has been developed. So the object of indication or indicator is called the recipient component for the purpose of which the indication is made. The physiognomic components used for indication are called indicators; as their most often various combinations of relief and vegetation appear, caused by complex or landscape indicators; if relief forms are used for indication, then they are called geomorphological indicators; if the indication is made by plant communities about geobotanical indicators. Among the indicators, direct and indirect ones are distinguished. Direct indicators are those that have a direct relationship with the indicator and depend on its distribution. Indirect indicators are those whose relationship with the indicator is through some intermediate link in the environment. Direct indicators are very stable and change little in different parts of the range, while indirect indicators are usually regional in nature. By the nature of the object, indicative studies conducted in the mountainous areas are divided into hydroindication, pedoindication, lithoindication and indication of minerals. For the practice of agricultural assessment of the territory, pedo-indicator and litho-indicator studies are of the greatest importance. Initially, in the mountainous regions, only a geobotanical indication took place. At the same time, the work had a predominant litho-indicative character. Indication of soils as an independent task was not posed. In most non-indicative works, it was not the relationship between vegetation and soil that was studied, but the relationship between vegetation and rock. The main modern directions in indicator research in mountainous areas are: a) the development of landscape indication when used as indicators of both landforms and their exposure and vegetation; b) the use of landscape indications to determine exogenous processes in the mountains; c) further development of litho-indication and refinement of its methodology. Further development of this area of research in the laboratory and VSEGINGEO methods under the direction of A.V. Sadova led to the formation of a concept according to which the development of exogenous processes in the mountains can be predicted based on landscape indications. In this case, the starting link is the compilation of a landscape map, which is then interpreted for indicative purposes. Interpretation is carried out by identifying which of the selected landscapes are characterized by certain exogenous processes. This identification is carried out by studying in the field key areas selected within different landscapes, as well as by viewing aerial photographs and fixing manifestations of various processes on them.
利用景观指标评价车臣共和国山区土壤和地面状况的现状
图书DOI: 10.21467/abstracts。最完整、最准确地揭示了其与地质、水文地质条件的关系。在航空景观指示中,已经发展了一定的术语。因此,指示或指示的对象被称为指示的目的接受者。用于指示的面相成分称为指标;由于其最常见的各种地形和植被组合出现,造成复杂或景观指标;若以地形形态作指示,则称地貌指示物;如果是植物群落对地学指标的指示。在这些指标中,有直接指标和间接指标之分。直接指标是那些与指标有直接关系并依赖于其分布的指标。间接指标是指通过环境中的某些中间环节与指标发生关系的指标。直接指标非常稳定,在不同范围内变化不大,而间接指标通常具有地域性。根据研究对象的性质,在山区进行的指示性研究分为水文指示、土壤指示、岩石指示和矿物指示。在领土农业评估的实践中,土壤指标和岩石指标的研究是最重要的。最初,在山区,只发生了地学上的指示。同时,作品具有突出的岩画特征。没有提出将土壤作为一项独立任务的指示。在大多数非指示性著作中,研究的不是植被与土壤的关系,而是植被与岩石的关系。现代山区指标研究的主要方向是:a)发展景观指标,将其作为地貌及其暴露程度和植被的指标;B)利用景观指示来确定山区的外生过程;C)进一步发展岩性指示和改进其方法。在A.V. Sadova的指导下,在实验室和VSEGINGEO方法中进一步发展了这一研究领域,形成了一个概念,根据该概念,可以根据景观指示来预测山区外生过程的发展。在这种情况下,开始环节是景观地图的编译,然后将其解释为指示性目的。通过确定哪些选定的景观具有某些外生过程的特征来进行解释。这种识别是通过实地研究在不同景观中选择的关键区域,以及通过查看航空照片并在其上固定各种过程的表现来进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信