CISG Versus English Sales Law: An Unfair Competition

Qi Zhou
{"title":"CISG Versus English Sales Law: An Unfair Competition","authors":"Qi Zhou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1941845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to answer the question why so many international traders choose English Sales Law instead of the CISG to govern their transactions.Through a comparison of the CISG and English Sales Law, this paper articulates the major competitive disadvantages of the CISG, and then suggests certain improvements for future reform.The discussion proceeds as follows. Section 2 sets the analysis into the historical context, reviewing briefly the developing histories of The CISG and English Sales Law. It is argued that English Sales Law has been widely used by commercial parties long before the enactment of the CISG. As a consequence, it has already established a dominant position in international trade which can hardly be challenged by the CISG. Section 3 addresses the fragmentary features of the CISG. Because of the way in which the CISG is drafted, many conflicting interests need to be balanced so that certain compromises have to be made. The CISG inevitably becomes a fragmentary body of legal rules, which undermines significantly its competitive advantages. The problems of ambiguity in the CISG and conflicting interpretations produced by its member states are evaluated in Sections 4 and 5 respectively, Finally, Section 6 concludes the discussion by offering some suggestions for future reform.","PeriodicalId":162065,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Law & Economics: Private Law (Topic)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Law & Economics: Private Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1941845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper aims to answer the question why so many international traders choose English Sales Law instead of the CISG to govern their transactions.Through a comparison of the CISG and English Sales Law, this paper articulates the major competitive disadvantages of the CISG, and then suggests certain improvements for future reform.The discussion proceeds as follows. Section 2 sets the analysis into the historical context, reviewing briefly the developing histories of The CISG and English Sales Law. It is argued that English Sales Law has been widely used by commercial parties long before the enactment of the CISG. As a consequence, it has already established a dominant position in international trade which can hardly be challenged by the CISG. Section 3 addresses the fragmentary features of the CISG. Because of the way in which the CISG is drafted, many conflicting interests need to be balanced so that certain compromises have to be made. The CISG inevitably becomes a fragmentary body of legal rules, which undermines significantly its competitive advantages. The problems of ambiguity in the CISG and conflicting interpretations produced by its member states are evaluated in Sections 4 and 5 respectively, Finally, Section 6 concludes the discussion by offering some suggestions for future reform.
《销售公约》与英国销售法:不正当竞争
本文旨在回答为什么如此多的国际贸易商选择英国销售法而不是CISG来管理他们的交易。本文通过对《销售公约》与英国《销售法》的比较,阐述了《销售公约》存在的主要竞争劣势,并对今后的改革提出了改进建议。讨论进行如下。第二节将分析置于历史背景中,简要回顾《销售公约》和英国销售法的发展历史。文章认为,早在《销售公约》颁布之前,英国《销售法》就已被商事当事人广泛使用。因此,中国已经在国际贸易中确立了主导地位,这是《销售公约》难以挑战的。第3节论述了《销售公约》零碎的特点。由于《销售公约》的起草方式,需要平衡许多相互冲突的利益,以便作出某些妥协。《销售公约》不可避免地成为一套支离破碎的法律规则,大大削弱了其竞争优势。第四节和第五节分别对《销售公约》中的歧义问题和成员国相互矛盾的解释进行了评估。最后,第六节对讨论进行了总结,并对未来的改革提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信