DBaaS comparison: Amazon vs. Microsoft

Irina Astrava, Arne Koschel, Chris Eickemeyer, Jan Kersten, Norman Offel
{"title":"DBaaS comparison: Amazon vs. Microsoft","authors":"Irina Astrava, Arne Koschel, Chris Eickemeyer, Jan Kersten, Norman Offel","doi":"10.23919/I-SOCIETY.2017.8354663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud-based computing holds promise for businesses that no longer need to own and maintain costly fixed-hardware assets. Seeing the benefits of lower costs and scale-as-needed capability, businesses are pursuing the cloud in ever increasing numbers. Database-as-a-Service (DBaaS) offerings are increasingly attractive to IT professionals. Many DBaaS offerings are relational database management systems requiring the use of SQL, but some are based on alternative technologies like NoSQL databases. In this paper, we look at both. In particular, we select DBaaS offerings from Amazon and Microsoft (viz., Amazon RDS, Amazon DynamoDB, Azure SQL Database and Azure DocumentDB) and parse out similarities and differences in their features.","PeriodicalId":285075,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Information Society (i-Society)","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Information Society (i-Society)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/I-SOCIETY.2017.8354663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Cloud-based computing holds promise for businesses that no longer need to own and maintain costly fixed-hardware assets. Seeing the benefits of lower costs and scale-as-needed capability, businesses are pursuing the cloud in ever increasing numbers. Database-as-a-Service (DBaaS) offerings are increasingly attractive to IT professionals. Many DBaaS offerings are relational database management systems requiring the use of SQL, but some are based on alternative technologies like NoSQL databases. In this paper, we look at both. In particular, we select DBaaS offerings from Amazon and Microsoft (viz., Amazon RDS, Amazon DynamoDB, Azure SQL Database and Azure DocumentDB) and parse out similarities and differences in their features.
DBaaS比较:亚马逊与微软
云计算为那些不再需要拥有和维护昂贵的固定硬件资产的企业带来了希望。看到低成本和按需扩展功能的好处,越来越多的企业正在追求云计算。数据库即服务(DBaaS)产品对IT专业人员的吸引力越来越大。许多DBaaS产品都是需要使用SQL的关系数据库管理系统,但也有一些基于NoSQL数据库等替代技术。在本文中,我们将对两者进行研究。特别是,我们选择了亚马逊和微软的DBaaS产品(即亚马逊RDS、亚马逊DynamoDB、Azure SQL数据库和Azure DocumentDB),并分析了它们在功能上的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信