Majority and Representation: A Political Economy Analysis of It-Enabled Democracy

Philémon Poux
{"title":"Majority and Representation: A Political Economy Analysis of It-Enabled Democracy","authors":"Philémon Poux","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3880337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following an increasingly large corpus of literature championing blockchain-based voting systems, this paper disentangles the issues that are blockchain specific and those that belong to the larger scope of e-voting. I provide a political economics analysis of e-voting under different constitutional settings. Using analytical tools from the fathers of Public Choice, I argue that switching to e-voting without modifying the institutions is unlikely to modify choice mechanisms. I then extend the analysis to Liquid Democracy and find that, while it can be well suited to small scales communities, it faces major limitations at large scale because it fails to provide a framework for bundling. All along the paper, examples based on blockchains are discussed to illustrate the analysis and link it with recent literature.","PeriodicalId":365899,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3880337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following an increasingly large corpus of literature championing blockchain-based voting systems, this paper disentangles the issues that are blockchain specific and those that belong to the larger scope of e-voting. I provide a political economics analysis of e-voting under different constitutional settings. Using analytical tools from the fathers of Public Choice, I argue that switching to e-voting without modifying the institutions is unlikely to modify choice mechanisms. I then extend the analysis to Liquid Democracy and find that, while it can be well suited to small scales communities, it faces major limitations at large scale because it fails to provide a framework for bundling. All along the paper, examples based on blockchains are discussed to illustrate the analysis and link it with recent literature.
多数与代表制:It-Enabled民主的政治经济学分析
在越来越多的文献支持基于区块链的投票系统之后,本文解开了区块链特定的问题和属于更大范围的电子投票的问题。我对不同宪法背景下的电子投票进行了政治经济学分析。利用公共选择之父们的分析工具,我认为,在不修改制度的情况下转向电子投票,不太可能改变选择机制。然后,我将分析扩展到流动民主,并发现,虽然它可以很好地适用于小规模社区,但它面临着大规模的限制,因为它没有提供捆绑的框架。在整个论文中,讨论了基于区块链的示例,以说明分析并将其与最近的文献联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信