How far from the shoreline? The effect of catchment land use on the ecological status of flow-through lakes

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Sebastian Kutyła , Agnieszka Kolada , Agnieszka Ławniczak-Malińska
{"title":"How far from the shoreline? The effect of catchment land use on the ecological status of flow-through lakes","authors":"Sebastian Kutyła ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Kolada ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Ławniczak-Malińska","doi":"10.1016/j.ecohyd.2023.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Catchment land use/land cover (LU/LC) is one of the crucial determinants of the water quality and condition of biota in aquatic environments. The aim of this study was to investigate how LU/LC in lake catchments influences the physicochemical and biological indicators used to assess the ecological status of lakes in Poland and whether these relationships vary depending on the spatial range. We analysed the catchment LU/LC forms of 114 flow-through lakes in three spatial ranges, i.e., a 100 m-wide buffer strip (BUF100), the direct catchment (DIR), and the total catchment (TOT). The water quality and biological variables were derived from the state monitoring conducted in the period 2012–2013. The redundancy analyses (RDA) and the Monte Carlo permutation tests depicted that the strength in explaining the parameter followed the order: TOT &gt; DIR &gt; BUF100 for physicochemical parameters, DIR = TOT &gt; BUF100 for phytoplankton indicators and BUF100 &gt; DIR &gt; TOT for macrophyte indicators. In the direct and total catchment, the proportion of arable lands was decisive in shaping the macrophyte and physicochemical status, while the proportion of artificial surfaces affected phytoplankton status. It was also found that forested buffer zones promoted good macrophyte ecological status. The other types of LU/LC, i.e., meadows and pastures, wetlands, and surface waters exhibited little to no or marginal impact on the physicochemical and biological indicators, regardless of the spatial scale considered. Our results contribute to the rational planning of land development in lake surroundings, including the design of protected areas for inland waters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56070,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642359323000939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Catchment land use/land cover (LU/LC) is one of the crucial determinants of the water quality and condition of biota in aquatic environments. The aim of this study was to investigate how LU/LC in lake catchments influences the physicochemical and biological indicators used to assess the ecological status of lakes in Poland and whether these relationships vary depending on the spatial range. We analysed the catchment LU/LC forms of 114 flow-through lakes in three spatial ranges, i.e., a 100 m-wide buffer strip (BUF100), the direct catchment (DIR), and the total catchment (TOT). The water quality and biological variables were derived from the state monitoring conducted in the period 2012–2013. The redundancy analyses (RDA) and the Monte Carlo permutation tests depicted that the strength in explaining the parameter followed the order: TOT > DIR > BUF100 for physicochemical parameters, DIR = TOT > BUF100 for phytoplankton indicators and BUF100 > DIR > TOT for macrophyte indicators. In the direct and total catchment, the proportion of arable lands was decisive in shaping the macrophyte and physicochemical status, while the proportion of artificial surfaces affected phytoplankton status. It was also found that forested buffer zones promoted good macrophyte ecological status. The other types of LU/LC, i.e., meadows and pastures, wetlands, and surface waters exhibited little to no or marginal impact on the physicochemical and biological indicators, regardless of the spatial scale considered. Our results contribute to the rational planning of land development in lake surroundings, including the design of protected areas for inland waters.

离海岸线有多远?集水区土地利用对流经湖泊生态状况的影响
集水区土地利用/土地覆盖(LU/LC)是水生环境中水质和生物群状况的重要决定因素之一。本研究的目的是调查湖泊集水区的土地利用/土地覆盖如何影响用于评估波兰湖泊生态状况的物理化学和生物指标,以及这些关系是否因空间范围而异。我们分析了 114 个流经湖泊在三个空间范围内的集水区 LU/LC 形式,即 100 米宽的缓冲带(BUF100)、直接集水区(DIR)和总集水区(TOT)。水质和生物变量来自 2012-2013 年期间进行的国家监测。冗余分析(RDA)和蒙特卡洛置换测试表明,参数的解释能力依次为理化参数为 TOT > DIR > BUF100,浮游植物指标为 DIR = TOT > BUF100,大型生物指标为 BUF100 > DIR > TOT。在直接集水区和总集水区,耕地比例对大型底栖生物和物理化学状况起着决定性作用,而人工地表比例则影响浮游植物状况。研究还发现,森林缓冲区能促进良好的大型底栖生物生态状况。其他类型的 LU/LC,即草地和牧场、湿地和地表水,无论考虑的空间尺度如何,对物理化学和生物指标的影响都很小,甚至没有影响。我们的研究结果有助于合理规划湖泊周边的土地开发,包括内陆水域保护区的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology is an international journal that aims to advance ecohydrology as the study of the interplay between ecological and hydrological processes from molecular to river basin scales, and to promote its implementation as an integrative management tool to harmonize societal needs with biosphere potential.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信