A review of the soft side in project management: concept, trends and challenges

Luiz Fernando C. S. Durão, Marcelo Vinicius Di Favari Grotti, Paulo Rafael Minetto Maceta, E. Zancul, F. Berssaneti, M. M. Carvalho
{"title":"A review of the soft side in project management: concept, trends and challenges","authors":"Luiz Fernando C. S. Durão, Marcelo Vinicius Di Favari Grotti, Paulo Rafael Minetto Maceta, E. Zancul, F. Berssaneti, M. M. Carvalho","doi":"10.15675/GEPROS.V12I2.1644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our aim is to analyze the changes that have taken place in the academic literature of project management induced by the growing interest in the soft side within project management, identifying concepts, trends and challenges. Based on a bibliometric approach, a systematic literature review focusing on content analysis was made in articles published from 1994 to 2015 in the ISI Web of Science and Scopus databases. The literature was found to maintain the separation between the hard and the soft side, being the soft side, for most researchers, an enabler of project performance and success. Each kind of examined skills provides different aspects of project quality and management, being the hard side clearer and more objective and the soft side more ambiguous and subjective. In the whole article, the base used 13 soft skills. The most cited among them was ‘Communication’, cited fifteen times, followed by ‘Leadership’ and ‘Teamwork’ cited nine times each. Despite the stronger impact of the soft skills in the project performance, the literature says that the project members, within the project team, must combine soft and hard skills towards the best performance of the projects.","PeriodicalId":396542,"journal":{"name":"GEPROS: Gestão da Produção, Operações e Sistemas","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEPROS: Gestão da Produção, Operações e Sistemas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15675/GEPROS.V12I2.1644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Our aim is to analyze the changes that have taken place in the academic literature of project management induced by the growing interest in the soft side within project management, identifying concepts, trends and challenges. Based on a bibliometric approach, a systematic literature review focusing on content analysis was made in articles published from 1994 to 2015 in the ISI Web of Science and Scopus databases. The literature was found to maintain the separation between the hard and the soft side, being the soft side, for most researchers, an enabler of project performance and success. Each kind of examined skills provides different aspects of project quality and management, being the hard side clearer and more objective and the soft side more ambiguous and subjective. In the whole article, the base used 13 soft skills. The most cited among them was ‘Communication’, cited fifteen times, followed by ‘Leadership’ and ‘Teamwork’ cited nine times each. Despite the stronger impact of the soft skills in the project performance, the literature says that the project members, within the project team, must combine soft and hard skills towards the best performance of the projects.
回顾项目管理中的软面:概念、趋势和挑战
我们的目的是分析项目管理学术文献中发生的变化,这些变化是由对项目管理中软方面的兴趣日益浓厚所引起的,确定概念、趋势和挑战。基于文献计量学方法,对1994 - 2015年在ISI Web of Science和Scopus数据库中发表的文章进行了以内容分析为重点的系统文献综述。研究发现,文献中保持了硬、软两方面的分离,对于大多数研究人员来说,软方面是项目绩效和成功的推动者。每一种被检查的技能都提供了项目质量和管理的不同方面,硬的方面更清晰、更客观,而软的方面更模糊、更主观。在整篇文章中,基地使用了13项软技能。其中被提及最多的是“沟通”,被提及15次,其次是“领导能力”和“团队合作”,分别被提及9次。尽管软技能对项目绩效的影响更大,但文献表明,项目团队中的项目成员必须将软技能和硬技能结合起来,以实现项目的最佳绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信