Informatization of health care: stakeholders interaction

A. Trakhtenberg, E. Dyakova
{"title":"Informatization of health care: stakeholders interaction","authors":"A. Trakhtenberg, E. Dyakova","doi":"10.2991/iscde-19.2019.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the analysis of theoretical models allowed to explain the reasons of the chronic problems in the field of healthcare informatization. The authors assume that problems are steadily reproduced and are of a general nature. The most important of these ones relate to a lack of interoperability and institutional resistance against implementation of the healthcare information systems by healthcare providers. This article also indicates that implementation of the healthcare information systems can lead not to enhancing but to decreasing the effectiveness of medical care providers work. The authors uses the reinforcement theory by K. Kraemer and J. King as an explaining scheme. This theory claims that the main impact of IT application has been to reinforce existing structures of authority and power in organizations and D. Collingridge’s model under which there is a tendency in ambitious projects to highly centralized decision making, dominated by large organizations, which are able to exclude many legitimate stakeholders, particularly, end-users. The authors conclude that the problems facing healthcare informatization are a result of submission of this process to the interests of only one stakeholder as healthcare managers without healthcare providers and patients.","PeriodicalId":203022,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference on Digital Economy (ISCDE 2019)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference on Digital Economy (ISCDE 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/iscde-19.2019.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on the analysis of theoretical models allowed to explain the reasons of the chronic problems in the field of healthcare informatization. The authors assume that problems are steadily reproduced and are of a general nature. The most important of these ones relate to a lack of interoperability and institutional resistance against implementation of the healthcare information systems by healthcare providers. This article also indicates that implementation of the healthcare information systems can lead not to enhancing but to decreasing the effectiveness of medical care providers work. The authors uses the reinforcement theory by K. Kraemer and J. King as an explaining scheme. This theory claims that the main impact of IT application has been to reinforce existing structures of authority and power in organizations and D. Collingridge’s model under which there is a tendency in ambitious projects to highly centralized decision making, dominated by large organizations, which are able to exclude many legitimate stakeholders, particularly, end-users. The authors conclude that the problems facing healthcare informatization are a result of submission of this process to the interests of only one stakeholder as healthcare managers without healthcare providers and patients.
卫生保健信息化:利益相关者互动
本文着重对理论模型进行分析,以解释医疗信息化领域中存在的长期问题的原因。作者假设问题是稳定再现的,并且具有普遍性。其中最重要的问题与缺乏互操作性和医疗保健提供者实施医疗保健信息系统的制度性阻力有关。本文还指出,医疗保健信息系统的实施可能导致不是提高,而是降低医疗服务提供者的工作效率。作者采用K. Kraemer和J. King的强化理论作为解释方案。该理论声称,IT应用的主要影响是加强了组织中现有的权威和权力结构,以及D. Collingridge的模型,在该模型下,雄心勃勃的项目倾向于高度集中的决策制定,由大型组织主导,这些组织能够排除许多合法的利益相关者,特别是最终用户。作者得出结论,医疗信息化面临的问题是由于这一过程只服从一个利益相关者作为医疗保健管理者的利益,而没有医疗保健提供者和患者的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信