Ensemble based classification using small training sets : A novel approach

C. V. K. Veni, Timmappareddy Sobha Rani
{"title":"Ensemble based classification using small training sets : A novel approach","authors":"C. V. K. Veni, Timmappareddy Sobha Rani","doi":"10.1109/CIEL.2014.7015738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classification is a supervised learning technique typically uses two-thirds of the given annotated data set for training and the remaining for test. In this paper, we developed a frame work which uses less than one-third of the data set for training and tests the remaining two-thirds of the data and still gives results comparable to other classifiers. To achieve good classification accuracy with small training sets, we focused on three issues: The first is that, one-third(30%) of the data should represent the entire data set. The second is on increasing the classification accuracy even with these small training sets, and the third issue is on taking care of deviations in the small training sets like noise or outliers. First issue is addressed by proposing three methods: divide the instances into 10 bins based on their distances from the centroid, based on their distance from a reference point 3/2(min+max) and a distribution specific binning. In all these methods, training sets are formed using stratified sampling approach which ensures that the samples chosen are from the entire distribution. Second issue is dealt with using the concept of ensemble based weighted majority voting for classification. Third issue is tackled by implementing four filters on training sets. The filters used are Removing Outliers using Inter Quartile Range option (available in Weka) and removing misclassified instances applying Naive Bayes, IB3, IB5 as filters. Experiments are conducted on seven binary andmulti-class data sets taking only 6% to 18% of the total data for training and implemented the proposed three methods without any filters for noise and outlier removal and with them too on the training sets.We compare our results with two popular ensemble methods ada-boost and bagging ensemble techniques, ENN, CNN, RNN instance selection methods. Empirical analysis shows that our three proposed methods yield comparable classification results to those available in literature which use small training sets.","PeriodicalId":229765,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Ensemble Learning (CIEL)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Ensemble Learning (CIEL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIEL.2014.7015738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Classification is a supervised learning technique typically uses two-thirds of the given annotated data set for training and the remaining for test. In this paper, we developed a frame work which uses less than one-third of the data set for training and tests the remaining two-thirds of the data and still gives results comparable to other classifiers. To achieve good classification accuracy with small training sets, we focused on three issues: The first is that, one-third(30%) of the data should represent the entire data set. The second is on increasing the classification accuracy even with these small training sets, and the third issue is on taking care of deviations in the small training sets like noise or outliers. First issue is addressed by proposing three methods: divide the instances into 10 bins based on their distances from the centroid, based on their distance from a reference point 3/2(min+max) and a distribution specific binning. In all these methods, training sets are formed using stratified sampling approach which ensures that the samples chosen are from the entire distribution. Second issue is dealt with using the concept of ensemble based weighted majority voting for classification. Third issue is tackled by implementing four filters on training sets. The filters used are Removing Outliers using Inter Quartile Range option (available in Weka) and removing misclassified instances applying Naive Bayes, IB3, IB5 as filters. Experiments are conducted on seven binary andmulti-class data sets taking only 6% to 18% of the total data for training and implemented the proposed three methods without any filters for noise and outlier removal and with them too on the training sets.We compare our results with two popular ensemble methods ada-boost and bagging ensemble techniques, ENN, CNN, RNN instance selection methods. Empirical analysis shows that our three proposed methods yield comparable classification results to those available in literature which use small training sets.
基于小训练集的集成分类:一种新方法
分类是一种监督学习技术,通常使用给定注释数据集的三分之二进行训练,其余用于测试。在本文中,我们开发了一个框架,它使用不到三分之一的数据集进行训练,并测试其余三分之二的数据,并且仍然给出与其他分类器相当的结果。为了在小的训练集上获得良好的分类精度,我们主要关注三个问题:第一,三分之一(30%)的数据应该代表整个数据集。第二个问题是如何提高这些小训练集的分类精度,第三个问题是如何处理小训练集中的偏差,比如噪声或异常值。第一个问题是通过提出三种方法来解决的:根据实例到质心的距离,根据它们到参考点3/2(min+max)的距离,以及一个特定分布的分类,将实例分为10个分类箱。在所有这些方法中,训练集的形成都采用分层抽样的方法,以确保所选样本来自整个分布。第二个问题是使用基于集成的加权多数投票的概念进行分类。第三个问题是通过在训练集上实现四个过滤器来解决的。使用的过滤器是使用Inter Quartile Range选项(在Weka中可用)去除异常值,以及使用朴素贝叶斯,IB3, IB5作为过滤器去除错误分类的实例。在7个二值和多类数据集上进行了实验,这些数据集只占总数据量的6%到18%,并在训练集上实现了所提出的三种方法,这些方法不含任何噪声和异常值去除滤波器。我们将我们的结果与两种流行的集成方法ada-boost和bagging集成技术,即ENN, CNN, RNN实例选择方法进行了比较。实证分析表明,我们提出的三种方法与文献中使用小训练集的分类结果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信