Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Instrument of the Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education

Ayla Bayık Temel, Aynur Uysal Toraman, Gulengul Mermer, Ebru Konal, Esin Ateş
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Instrument of the Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education","authors":"Ayla Bayık Temel, Aynur Uysal Toraman, Gulengul Mermer, Ebru Konal, Esin Ateş","doi":"10.5961/higheredusci.1078501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Quality of Doctoral Education in Nursing \n(QNDE) scale. The lack of a measurement tool examining the quality of doctoral education in nursing in a national context is the reason for \nthis study. Data were collected from 55 teaching staff and 225 doctorate students. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyzes were used \nfor test validity. Cronbach’s α coefficient of reliability, independent-sample t test, and test-retest analysis were calculated to test Reliability. \nThe factor loads ranged between 0.51-0.91.The construct validity was good (χ2/df =3.02; RMSEA = 0.085; CFI = 0.87; NFI = 0.90; GFI \n= 0.79; TLI = 0.90; IFI =0.91; p < 0.001). The Cronbach alpha value of the scale was 0.94. The results of this study show that the Turkish \nversion of the Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education instrument is a valid and reliable tool.","PeriodicalId":119364,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education and Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1078501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Quality of Doctoral Education in Nursing (QNDE) scale. The lack of a measurement tool examining the quality of doctoral education in nursing in a national context is the reason for this study. Data were collected from 55 teaching staff and 225 doctorate students. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyzes were used for test validity. Cronbach’s α coefficient of reliability, independent-sample t test, and test-retest analysis were calculated to test Reliability. The factor loads ranged between 0.51-0.91.The construct validity was good (χ2/df =3.02; RMSEA = 0.085; CFI = 0.87; NFI = 0.90; GFI = 0.79; TLI = 0.90; IFI =0.91; p < 0.001). The Cronbach alpha value of the scale was 0.94. The results of this study show that the Turkish version of the Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education instrument is a valid and reliable tool.
土耳其语版护理博士教育质量评估工具的效度和信度
本研究的目的是确定土耳其版护理博士教育质量(QNDE)量表的效度和信度。缺乏一个测量工具检查质量的博士教育护理在全国范围内是本研究的原因。数据收集自55名教职员工和225名博士生。测试效度采用解释性和验证性因子分析。采用Cronbach′s α信度系数、独立样本t检验和重测分析进行信度检验。因子负荷在0.51 ~ 0.91之间。结构效度较好(χ2/df =3.02;Rmsea = 0.085;Cfi = 0.87;Nfi = 0.90;Gfi = 0.79;Tli = 0.90;如果= 0.91;P < 0.001)。量表的Cronbach alpha值为0.94。本研究结果显示,土耳其版护理博士教育质量量表是一个有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信