If you can't be secure, be resilient

E. Wilkinson, Laura R. Cleary
{"title":"If you can't be secure, be resilient","authors":"E. Wilkinson, Laura R. Cleary","doi":"10.4324/9781003137061-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction We begin our discussion of security and resilience by offering a ‘health warning’: over the following pages the reader will encounter more questions than answers. Our aim within this chapter is not to tell the reader what to think, but to help identify issues for consideration when developing security capabilities. We acknowledge that the concepts of security and resilience are both contested (Buzan, 1991; Walklate et al, 2014). We also accept that neither security nor resilience are fixed attributes of a society. They are ‘multilayered, multifaceted’ (Walklate et al, 2014), in variable evidence over time, and rarely the sole responsibility of any one entity.","PeriodicalId":288358,"journal":{"name":"Managing Security","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managing Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003137061-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction We begin our discussion of security and resilience by offering a ‘health warning’: over the following pages the reader will encounter more questions than answers. Our aim within this chapter is not to tell the reader what to think, but to help identify issues for consideration when developing security capabilities. We acknowledge that the concepts of security and resilience are both contested (Buzan, 1991; Walklate et al, 2014). We also accept that neither security nor resilience are fixed attributes of a society. They are ‘multilayered, multifaceted’ (Walklate et al, 2014), in variable evidence over time, and rarely the sole responsibility of any one entity.
如果你不能保证安全,那就保持弹性
我们通过提供一个“健康警告”开始讨论安全性和弹性:在接下来的页面中,读者将遇到更多的问题而不是答案。本章的目的不是告诉读者该怎么想,而是帮助确定在开发安全功能时需要考虑的问题。我们承认,安全和弹性的概念都有争议(Buzan, 1991;Walklate et al, 2014)。我们也承认,安全和恢复力都不是社会的固定属性。它们是“多层次、多面性的”(Walklate等人,2014年),随着时间的推移,证据会有所不同,而且很少是任何一个实体的单独责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信