Feedback of the faculty participants on training workshop on developing multiple choice questions

R. Piryani, Suneet Piryani, Nudrat Zeba
{"title":"Feedback of the faculty participants on training workshop on developing multiple choice questions","authors":"R. Piryani, Suneet Piryani, Nudrat Zeba","doi":"10.3126/jgmcn.v15i2.46902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Multiple choice questions are commonly used tools for the written assessment of undergraduate health professions students. Faculty members need training for the development of valid and reliable multiple choice questions. For this purpose, Bilwal medical college organized one-day training workshop on developing multiple choice questions for newly recruited faculty members in March 2021. The main objective of the study was to assess the feedback of the participants on training workshop.\nMethods: This descriptive cross-sectional study assessed the feedback of the participants of training workshop on developing multiple choice questions. The feedback questionnaire had four questions. First was on “rating training workshop on scale 1 to 10 (1=poor, 10=excellent) for usefulness, content, relevance, facilitation and overall”. Second was on confidence of the participants in developing MCQs after participation based on Likert scale 1 to 4 (1=not confident to 4=extremely confident). Third was on perceptions of the participants on strengths of training workshop. Lastly, fourth was on areas for improvement. The data was analyzed for central tendency using microsoft excel.\nResults:  Participants’ feedback rating about usefulness (8.82±1.51), content (8.12±1.69), relevance (8.35±1.46), facilitation (8.41±1.46) and overall (global) rating (8.35±1.41) was remarkable. Their confidence level after participation (3.41±0.51) was noticeable.\nConclusions: The perceptions of the participants immediate after the training workshop i.e, their reaction was positive.","PeriodicalId":177622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gandaki Medical College-Nepal","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gandaki Medical College-Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jgmcn.v15i2.46902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple choice questions are commonly used tools for the written assessment of undergraduate health professions students. Faculty members need training for the development of valid and reliable multiple choice questions. For this purpose, Bilwal medical college organized one-day training workshop on developing multiple choice questions for newly recruited faculty members in March 2021. The main objective of the study was to assess the feedback of the participants on training workshop. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study assessed the feedback of the participants of training workshop on developing multiple choice questions. The feedback questionnaire had four questions. First was on “rating training workshop on scale 1 to 10 (1=poor, 10=excellent) for usefulness, content, relevance, facilitation and overall”. Second was on confidence of the participants in developing MCQs after participation based on Likert scale 1 to 4 (1=not confident to 4=extremely confident). Third was on perceptions of the participants on strengths of training workshop. Lastly, fourth was on areas for improvement. The data was analyzed for central tendency using microsoft excel. Results:  Participants’ feedback rating about usefulness (8.82±1.51), content (8.12±1.69), relevance (8.35±1.46), facilitation (8.41±1.46) and overall (global) rating (8.35±1.41) was remarkable. Their confidence level after participation (3.41±0.51) was noticeable. Conclusions: The perceptions of the participants immediate after the training workshop i.e, their reaction was positive.
参与培训工作坊的教师对发展选择题的反馈
多项选择题是卫生专业本科学生书面评估的常用工具。教师需要培训,以发展有效和可靠的选择题。为此,比尔瓦尔医学院于2021年3月组织了为期一天的培训讲习班,为新招聘的教员编写多项选择题。本研究的主要目的是评估学员对培训工作坊的反馈。方法:采用描述性横断面研究的方法,对参加多选题开发培训工作坊的学生的反馈进行评估。反馈问卷有四个问题。首先是关于“对培训讲习班的有用性、内容、相关性、便捷性和总体情况按1至10分(1=差,10=优秀)进行评分”。其次是参与者在参与后根据李克特量表1到4(1=不自信到4=非常自信)制定mcq的信心。第三是关于与会者对培训讲习班优势的看法。最后,第四是有待改进的领域。采用microsoft excel对数据进行集中趋势分析。结果:被试在有用性(8.82±1.51)、内容(8.12±1.69)、相关性(8.35±1.46)、促进性(8.41±1.46)和总体(整体)评分(8.35±1.41)方面得分显著。参与后的置信水平(3.41±0.51)显著。结论:在培训工作坊结束后,参与者的认知,即他们的反应是积极的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信