D & L amphetamine stereoisomers: comparative potencies in affecting the firing of central dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurons.

Psychopharmacology communications Pub Date : 1975-01-01
B S Bunney, J R Walters, M J Kuhar, R H Roth, G K Aghajanian
{"title":"D & L amphetamine stereoisomers: comparative potencies in affecting the firing of central dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurons.","authors":"B S Bunney,&nbsp;J R Walters,&nbsp;M J Kuhar,&nbsp;R H Roth,&nbsp;G K Aghajanian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of the d- and l-isomers of amphetamine on the activity of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra zona compacta and noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus was studied in anesthetized and gallamine paralyzed rats using single unit recording techniques. d- and l-Amphetamine administered intravenously were equally effective in depressing the activity of locus coeruleus cells. However, although d-amphetamine was a potent inhibitor of substantia nigra dopamine containing cells, l-amphetamine was ineffective in causing more than a 45% inhibition of over half of the DA cells studied, even when given in nearly lethal doses. In the remaining dopamine neurons l-amphetamine was only 0.2 to 0.05 times as potent as d-amphetamine in producing both 50 and 100% inhibition of firing rate. These findings, when combined with recent biochemical studies by other authors, suggest that l-amphetamine, at low doses, has a preferential effect on noradrenergic as compared to dopaminergic neurons. The consequences of these findings for the interpretation of studies in which d- and l-amphetamine have been used as pharmacological tools to determine the catecholamine system responsible for a particular behavior in man and animals is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":76387,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology communications","volume":"1 2","pages":"177-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of the d- and l-isomers of amphetamine on the activity of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra zona compacta and noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus was studied in anesthetized and gallamine paralyzed rats using single unit recording techniques. d- and l-Amphetamine administered intravenously were equally effective in depressing the activity of locus coeruleus cells. However, although d-amphetamine was a potent inhibitor of substantia nigra dopamine containing cells, l-amphetamine was ineffective in causing more than a 45% inhibition of over half of the DA cells studied, even when given in nearly lethal doses. In the remaining dopamine neurons l-amphetamine was only 0.2 to 0.05 times as potent as d-amphetamine in producing both 50 and 100% inhibition of firing rate. These findings, when combined with recent biochemical studies by other authors, suggest that l-amphetamine, at low doses, has a preferential effect on noradrenergic as compared to dopaminergic neurons. The consequences of these findings for the interpretation of studies in which d- and l-amphetamine have been used as pharmacological tools to determine the catecholamine system responsible for a particular behavior in man and animals is discussed.

D和L安非他命立体异构体:影响中枢多巴胺能和去甲肾上腺素能神经元放电的比较效力。
采用单单元记录技术研究了安非他明d-和l-异构体对麻醉大鼠黑质致密带多巴胺能神经元和蓝斑去甲肾上腺素能神经元活性的影响。d-安非他明和l-安非他明静脉注射在抑制蓝斑细胞活性方面同样有效。然而,尽管d-安非他明是含有黑质多巴胺的细胞的有效抑制剂,但l-安非他明对半数以上的DA细胞的抑制作用超过45%,即使是在接近致死剂量的情况下。在剩余的多巴胺神经元中,l-安非他明对放电率的抑制作用仅为d-安非他明的0.2至0.05倍。这些发现,结合其他作者最近的生化研究表明,与多巴胺能神经元相比,低剂量的l-安非他明对去甲肾上腺素能神经元有优先作用。本研究讨论了这些发现对d-安非他明和l-安非他明作为药理学工具来确定导致人类和动物特定行为的儿茶酚胺系统的解释的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信