Reinventing performance management in the public sector

Jane Gunn, K. Zwickert, Kathy F. Hilyard
{"title":"Reinventing performance management in the public sector","authors":"Jane Gunn, K. Zwickert, Kathy F. Hilyard","doi":"10.4337/9781789901207.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is increasingly evident that performance management practices prevalent in the public sector are underpinned by assumptions that do not serve a contemporary public service. Since performance management was introduced into the public sector, the requirements on public servants have changed markedly and continue to change rapidly. The need for greater agility, innovation and new thinking about service delivery and the achievement of policy outcomes for Australia and its citizens is clear and no longer contentious. Fundamentally, this is an evolving definition of high performance that arguably sits uncomfortably beside requirements for transparency and adherence to due process in a highly scrutinised (and rightly so) context. We argue that performance management can play an important role in supporting public servants and leaders, in particular to navigate these inherent tensions in defining what ‘good’ looks like as they embrace the shift required and re-imagine a new form of public sector performance. Clearly there are structural aspects to the changes needed to embed new ways of working in the Australian Public Service (APS). We argue that the current performance management frameworks play a role in holding the APS back with tools and assumptions that are no longer fit for purpose and were developed for another time. We propose a new purpose, principles and practical strategies for evolving to a new more contemporary and fit-for-now approach. Our intent is this chapter contributes to the ongoing academic and practitioner debate regarding high performance public service in a complex and evolving context. It is our hope that these ideas provide a framework against which public sector agencies might compare and evolve their current practices.","PeriodicalId":176039,"journal":{"name":"Handbook on Performance Management in the Public Sector","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook on Performance Management in the Public Sector","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901207.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is increasingly evident that performance management practices prevalent in the public sector are underpinned by assumptions that do not serve a contemporary public service. Since performance management was introduced into the public sector, the requirements on public servants have changed markedly and continue to change rapidly. The need for greater agility, innovation and new thinking about service delivery and the achievement of policy outcomes for Australia and its citizens is clear and no longer contentious. Fundamentally, this is an evolving definition of high performance that arguably sits uncomfortably beside requirements for transparency and adherence to due process in a highly scrutinised (and rightly so) context. We argue that performance management can play an important role in supporting public servants and leaders, in particular to navigate these inherent tensions in defining what ‘good’ looks like as they embrace the shift required and re-imagine a new form of public sector performance. Clearly there are structural aspects to the changes needed to embed new ways of working in the Australian Public Service (APS). We argue that the current performance management frameworks play a role in holding the APS back with tools and assumptions that are no longer fit for purpose and were developed for another time. We propose a new purpose, principles and practical strategies for evolving to a new more contemporary and fit-for-now approach. Our intent is this chapter contributes to the ongoing academic and practitioner debate regarding high performance public service in a complex and evolving context. It is our hope that these ideas provide a framework against which public sector agencies might compare and evolve their current practices.
重塑公共部门的绩效管理
越来越明显的是,公共部门普遍存在的绩效管理做法是基于不利于当代公共服务的假设。自从在公共部门推行绩效管理以来,对公务员的要求有了明显的变化,而且还在迅速变化。在服务交付和政策成果的实现方面,澳大利亚及其公民需要更大的灵活性、创新和新思维,这是明确的,不再有争议。从根本上说,这是对高绩效的一种不断演变的定义,可以说,在高度审查(这是正确的)的背景下,这种定义与对透明度和遵守正当程序的要求格格不入。我们认为,绩效管理可以在支持公务员和领导人方面发挥重要作用,特别是在他们接受所需的转变并重新设想公共部门绩效的新形式时,在定义“好”的样子时,在这些固有的紧张关系中进行导航。显然,在澳大利亚公共服务(APS)中嵌入新的工作方式需要进行结构方面的改革。我们认为,当前的绩效管理框架在阻碍APS方面发挥了作用,这些工具和假设不再适合目的,并且是在另一个时代开发的。我们提出了一个新的目标、原则和实际战略,以发展一种新的更现代和适合现在的做法。我们的目的是,本章有助于在复杂和不断变化的背景下进行的关于高绩效公共服务的学术和实践辩论。我们希望这些想法能提供一个框架,供公共部门机构比较和发展它们目前的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信