Globalization Becoming Instrumental in Re-thinking the Global City: A Postcolonial Reading

A. Das, Dr. Madhumita Roy
{"title":"Globalization Becoming Instrumental in Re-thinking the Global City: A Postcolonial Reading","authors":"A. Das, Dr. Madhumita Roy","doi":"10.48189/nl.2022.v03i1.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper will focus upon how the multi-faceted forces of global capitalism become operational in producing and contributing to the cultural homogeneity on a global scale. In contemporary times, the patterns of urbanization and the hierarchies embedded in them are largely connected to and resulted from the colonial rule. Global cities are characterized by the socio-economic polarizations in the population. The existing inequities between the urban and non-urban populations become more prominent due to direct foreign investments in global cities. Both the architecture and the urban space are affected by the discursive forces of the global cities along with the built environment which also bears the impacts. The significance of the historical processes of globalization have been downplayed in the economic and presentist analyses of how the contemporary global cities are formed. The growth of research has immensely expanded in the last three decades in the history of colonialism and the postcolonial architecture and urbanism. What is reflected in recent studies of postcolonial criticism is that how the postcolonial urbanism is more attentive to the role and activities of the native as alternative voices and visions. This paper will also critically analyze how the term ‘global city’ has been appropriated by the discursive forces of globalization to represent and reify, a particular aspect of both the city’s activity as well as of the world, the world of economy. Hence, postcolonial criticisms become instrumental in dealing with the issues of representations, globalization, nationalism, historiography and cultural identities.","PeriodicalId":205595,"journal":{"name":"New Literaria","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48189/nl.2022.v03i1.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper will focus upon how the multi-faceted forces of global capitalism become operational in producing and contributing to the cultural homogeneity on a global scale. In contemporary times, the patterns of urbanization and the hierarchies embedded in them are largely connected to and resulted from the colonial rule. Global cities are characterized by the socio-economic polarizations in the population. The existing inequities between the urban and non-urban populations become more prominent due to direct foreign investments in global cities. Both the architecture and the urban space are affected by the discursive forces of the global cities along with the built environment which also bears the impacts. The significance of the historical processes of globalization have been downplayed in the economic and presentist analyses of how the contemporary global cities are formed. The growth of research has immensely expanded in the last three decades in the history of colonialism and the postcolonial architecture and urbanism. What is reflected in recent studies of postcolonial criticism is that how the postcolonial urbanism is more attentive to the role and activities of the native as alternative voices and visions. This paper will also critically analyze how the term ‘global city’ has been appropriated by the discursive forces of globalization to represent and reify, a particular aspect of both the city’s activity as well as of the world, the world of economy. Hence, postcolonial criticisms become instrumental in dealing with the issues of representations, globalization, nationalism, historiography and cultural identities.
全球化成为重新思考全球城市的工具:一种后殖民解读
本文将关注全球资本主义的多方面力量如何在全球范围内生产和促进文化同质性方面发挥作用。在当代,城市化模式及其所蕴含的等级制度在很大程度上与殖民统治有关,也是殖民统治的产物。全球城市的特点是人口的社会经济两极分化。由于外国对全球城市的直接投资,城市和非城市人口之间现有的不平等变得更加突出。无论是建筑还是城市空间都受到全球城市话语力量的影响,建筑环境也受到影响。在对当代全球城市形成的经济和现实主义分析中,全球化历史进程的重要性被淡化了。在过去的三十年里,研究的增长在殖民主义和后殖民建筑和城市主义的历史上得到了极大的扩展。最近对后殖民批评的研究反映出,后殖民城市主义如何更加关注本土作为另一种声音和愿景的角色和活动。本文还将批判性地分析“全球城市”一词是如何被全球化的话语力量所利用的,以代表和具体化城市活动以及世界经济世界的一个特定方面。因此,后殖民批评成为处理表征、全球化、民族主义、史学和文化认同等问题的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信