{"title":"‘Unmistakably a book by a feminist’: Helen Garner’s Monkey Grip and its feminist contexts","authors":"Z. Simic","doi":"10.22459/er.2019.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For Sue King, writing in Vashti, the journal of Melbourne Women’s Liberation, Helen Garner’s book Monkey Grip (1977)—like some other critics, she stopped short of calling it a novel—was clearly a feminist read. Nora, she observed, is ‘not overtly “political” in the sense of working for political change on the macro level, or even consistently working out the politics of everything that happens to her’. Nor can she, as a denizen of a ‘rather strange sub-culture’ be properly described as an ‘everywoman’. Yet for King, Nora was also ‘clearly recognisable as a woman whose central identity is her own’. ‘It’s just so nice’, she enthused, ‘to read a story where no one is married or wants to be; where people may on occasion be jealous or dependent, yet feel no entitlement to do so’. King devoured the book in 24 hours, but while her review came with a strong personal recommendation, she did wonder whether anyone beyond ‘an arty little sub group’ would relate to it. She concluded on a note of uncertainty: ‘is this something we have to pass through on the way to ... ?’1","PeriodicalId":384625,"journal":{"name":"Everyday Revolutions: Remaking Gender, Sexuality and Culture in 1970s Australia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Everyday Revolutions: Remaking Gender, Sexuality and Culture in 1970s Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/er.2019.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For Sue King, writing in Vashti, the journal of Melbourne Women’s Liberation, Helen Garner’s book Monkey Grip (1977)—like some other critics, she stopped short of calling it a novel—was clearly a feminist read. Nora, she observed, is ‘not overtly “political” in the sense of working for political change on the macro level, or even consistently working out the politics of everything that happens to her’. Nor can she, as a denizen of a ‘rather strange sub-culture’ be properly described as an ‘everywoman’. Yet for King, Nora was also ‘clearly recognisable as a woman whose central identity is her own’. ‘It’s just so nice’, she enthused, ‘to read a story where no one is married or wants to be; where people may on occasion be jealous or dependent, yet feel no entitlement to do so’. King devoured the book in 24 hours, but while her review came with a strong personal recommendation, she did wonder whether anyone beyond ‘an arty little sub group’ would relate to it. She concluded on a note of uncertainty: ‘is this something we have to pass through on the way to ... ?’1
Sue King在《Vashti》(墨尔本妇女解放杂志)上写道,海伦·加纳的《Monkey Grip》(1977)——就像其他一些评论家一样,她没有把它称为小说——显然是一本女权主义读物。她观察到,在宏观层面上为政治变革而努力的意义上,诺拉“并没有明显的‘政治’,甚至没有一直把发生在她身上的每件事都与政治扯上关系”。作为一名“相当奇怪的亚文化”的成员,她也不能被恰当地描述为“普通女性”。然而,对于金来说,诺拉也是“一个以自己为中心的女性”。“这真是太好了,”她热情地说,“读到一个没有人结婚或不想结婚的故事;人们可能偶尔会嫉妒或依赖,但却觉得没有权利这样做。”金在24小时内读完了这本书,尽管她的书评得到了强烈的个人推荐,但她确实想知道,除了“艺术小群体”之外,是否还有人会对这本书感兴趣。她不确定地总结道:“这是我们在通往……的路上必须经过的事情吗?”1 ?”