Efficacy of Different Forms of Green Manure Crops to Reduce Verticillium dahliae in Different Soils

Swann Dalbard, V. Michel
{"title":"Efficacy of Different Forms of Green Manure Crops to Reduce Verticillium dahliae in Different Soils","authors":"Swann Dalbard, V. Michel","doi":"10.15377/2409-9813.2021.08.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficacy of green manure crops to reduce the number of Verticillium dahliae microsclerotia in different soils was investigated. Green manures tested were Indian mustard with a high glucosinolate content and sorghum-sudangrass as biocidal plants, and Indian mustard with a low glucosinolate content and rye as non-biocidal plants. The green manure plants were applied in fresh, dried, and ensilaged form. When applied as fresh plants, the glucosinolate content determining the biocidal activity of Indian mustard was only important in loam soil but not in sandy loam soil. In the latter soil, the non-biocidal rye had significantly higher efficacy than the Indian mustard. Volatiles released by fresh and dried, but not ensilaged, Indian mustard with a high glucosinolate content strongly decreased the number of living V. dahliae microsclerotia. When the same green manure crops were added to sandy loam and clay loam soil, the effect of the high glucosinolate content Indian mustard in fresh and dried form disappeared, whereas the ensilaged green manure crops had the highest efficacy. This effect was based on the increase of the soil microbial activity and the Streptomyces population size, which were negatively correlated with the number of living V. dahliae microsclerotia in the soil.","PeriodicalId":356623,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Agricultural Innovation, Research & Development","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Agricultural Innovation, Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9813.2021.08.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficacy of green manure crops to reduce the number of Verticillium dahliae microsclerotia in different soils was investigated. Green manures tested were Indian mustard with a high glucosinolate content and sorghum-sudangrass as biocidal plants, and Indian mustard with a low glucosinolate content and rye as non-biocidal plants. The green manure plants were applied in fresh, dried, and ensilaged form. When applied as fresh plants, the glucosinolate content determining the biocidal activity of Indian mustard was only important in loam soil but not in sandy loam soil. In the latter soil, the non-biocidal rye had significantly higher efficacy than the Indian mustard. Volatiles released by fresh and dried, but not ensilaged, Indian mustard with a high glucosinolate content strongly decreased the number of living V. dahliae microsclerotia. When the same green manure crops were added to sandy loam and clay loam soil, the effect of the high glucosinolate content Indian mustard in fresh and dried form disappeared, whereas the ensilaged green manure crops had the highest efficacy. This effect was based on the increase of the soil microbial activity and the Streptomyces population size, which were negatively correlated with the number of living V. dahliae microsclerotia in the soil.
不同形式绿肥作物对不同土壤中大丽花黄萎病的防治效果
研究了绿肥作物对不同土壤中大丽花黄萎病微核菌数量的抑制效果。绿色肥料以硫代葡萄糖苷含量高的印度芥菜和高粱-苏丹草为杀虫植物,硫代葡萄糖苷含量低的印度芥菜和黑麦为非杀虫植物。绿肥植物以新鲜、干燥和青贮的形式施用。新鲜植株施用时,硫代葡萄糖苷含量对芥菜的杀虫活性仅在壤土中起重要作用,在砂壤土中不起作用。在后者土壤中,不杀虫黑麦的防治效果显著高于芥菜。硫代葡萄糖苷含量高的印度芥菜在鲜干而非青贮条件下释放出的挥发物显著降低了大丽弧菌微核菌的存活数量。在砂壤土和粘土壤土中添加相同的绿肥作物时,新鲜和干燥形式的高硫代葡萄糖苷含量的印度芥菜的效果消失,而青贮的绿肥作物的效果最高。这种效应是基于土壤微生物活性和链霉菌种群数量的增加,它们与土壤中大丽花小菌核活菌数呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信