On practising politicized practice: What do we learn?

M. Jordan, Ian Bruff
{"title":"On practising politicized practice: What do we learn?","authors":"M. Jordan, Ian Bruff","doi":"10.1386/aps_00065_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, which introduces the second of two Special Issues on the theme of ‘politicizing artistic pedagogies’, we turn our attention to the practice and practising of artistic pedagogies. This issue’s emphasis is on presenting versions of pedagogical practice that perform politicizing modes of engagement. Accordingly, the issue and this introductory essay build on the understanding of art, politics and pedagogy outlined in the introductory essay from the first Special Issue (Volume 10, Issue 2 of Art & the Public Sphere). At the same time, the below discussion departs from our collaborations, which was the focus in the introduction to the first Special Issue, to consider our individual attempts at performing pedagogy via situated politics. For instance, Mel’s recent project as part of the Partisan Social Club, How to Talk to the City: Public Interventions and Observations in the Practice of Art and Ethnography, and Ian’s work with students on novel methods for engaging with the contested concept of ‘Europe’. These ‘projects’ are not evaluated from the point of view of the participants/students, although the interactions between us and them are discussed. Thus, our rationale for including them in this essay is to forefront our pedagogical strategies and what this means for our attempts at politicizing practice; they are not case studies in a traditional ‘teaching techniques’ sense. Finally, we briefly introduce the articles that comprise the Special Issue.","PeriodicalId":335951,"journal":{"name":"Art & the Public Sphere","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art & the Public Sphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00065_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, which introduces the second of two Special Issues on the theme of ‘politicizing artistic pedagogies’, we turn our attention to the practice and practising of artistic pedagogies. This issue’s emphasis is on presenting versions of pedagogical practice that perform politicizing modes of engagement. Accordingly, the issue and this introductory essay build on the understanding of art, politics and pedagogy outlined in the introductory essay from the first Special Issue (Volume 10, Issue 2 of Art & the Public Sphere). At the same time, the below discussion departs from our collaborations, which was the focus in the introduction to the first Special Issue, to consider our individual attempts at performing pedagogy via situated politics. For instance, Mel’s recent project as part of the Partisan Social Club, How to Talk to the City: Public Interventions and Observations in the Practice of Art and Ethnography, and Ian’s work with students on novel methods for engaging with the contested concept of ‘Europe’. These ‘projects’ are not evaluated from the point of view of the participants/students, although the interactions between us and them are discussed. Thus, our rationale for including them in this essay is to forefront our pedagogical strategies and what this means for our attempts at politicizing practice; they are not case studies in a traditional ‘teaching techniques’ sense. Finally, we briefly introduce the articles that comprise the Special Issue.
论实行政治化实践:我们学到了什么?
本文以“艺术教育学政治化”为主题,介绍了两期特刊中的第二期,我们将目光转向艺术教育学的实践与实践。这期的重点是呈现教学实践的版本,执行政治化的参与模式。因此,该问题和这篇介绍性文章建立在第一期特刊(第10卷,第2期《艺术与公共领域》)介绍性文章中概述的对艺术、政治和教育学的理解之上。与此同时,下面的讨论脱离了我们的合作,这是第一期特刊引言的重点,考虑我们通过情境政治来执行教学的个人尝试。例如,梅尔最近作为党派社会俱乐部的一部分的项目,如何与城市交谈:艺术和民族志实践中的公共干预和观察,以及伊恩与学生一起研究参与有争议的“欧洲”概念的新方法的工作。这些“项目”不是从参与者/学生的角度来评估的,尽管我们和他们之间的互动是讨论的。因此,我们将它们纳入本文的基本原理是将我们的教学策略放在首位,以及这对我们试图将实践政治化意味着什么;它们不是传统的“教学技术”意义上的案例研究。最后,我们将简要介绍本期特刊的文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信