Systems thinking for safety and security

William Young, N. Leveson
{"title":"Systems thinking for safety and security","authors":"William Young, N. Leveson","doi":"10.1145/2523649.2530277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental challenge facing security professionals is preventing losses, be they operational, financial or mission losses. As a result, one could argue that security professionals share this challenge with safety professionals. Despite their shared challenge, there is little evidence that recent advances that enable one community to better prevent losses have been shared with the other for possible implementation. Limitations in current safety approaches have led researchers and practitioners to develop new models and techniques. These techniques could potentially benefit the field of security. This paper describes a new systems thinking approach to safety that may be suitable for meeting the challenge of securing complex systems against cyber disruptions. Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis for Security (STPA-Sec) augments traditional security approaches by introducing a top-down analysis process designed to help a multidisciplinary team consisting of security, operations, and domain experts identify and constrain the system from entering vulnerable states that lead to losses. This new framework shifts the focus of the security analysis away from threats as the proximate cause of losses and focuses instead on the broader system structure that allowed the system to enter a vulnerable system state that the threat exploits to produce the disruption leading to the loss.","PeriodicalId":127404,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 29th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"114","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 29th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2523649.2530277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 114

Abstract

The fundamental challenge facing security professionals is preventing losses, be they operational, financial or mission losses. As a result, one could argue that security professionals share this challenge with safety professionals. Despite their shared challenge, there is little evidence that recent advances that enable one community to better prevent losses have been shared with the other for possible implementation. Limitations in current safety approaches have led researchers and practitioners to develop new models and techniques. These techniques could potentially benefit the field of security. This paper describes a new systems thinking approach to safety that may be suitable for meeting the challenge of securing complex systems against cyber disruptions. Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis for Security (STPA-Sec) augments traditional security approaches by introducing a top-down analysis process designed to help a multidisciplinary team consisting of security, operations, and domain experts identify and constrain the system from entering vulnerable states that lead to losses. This new framework shifts the focus of the security analysis away from threats as the proximate cause of losses and focuses instead on the broader system structure that allowed the system to enter a vulnerable system state that the threat exploits to produce the disruption leading to the loss.
安全保障的系统思考
安全专业人员面临的根本挑战是防止损失,无论是操作上的、财务上的还是任务上的损失。因此,有人可能会说,安全专业人员与安全专业人员共享这个挑战。尽管面临着共同的挑战,但几乎没有证据表明,能够使一个社区更好地预防损失的最新进展已与另一个社区分享,以便可能实施。当前安全方法的局限性促使研究人员和从业人员开发新的模型和技术。这些技术可能对安全领域有潜在的好处。本文描述了一种新的系统思维安全方法,该方法可能适用于满足保护复杂系统免受网络中断的挑战。系统理论过程安全分析(STPA-Sec)通过引入自上而下的分析过程来增强传统的安全方法,该分析过程旨在帮助由安全、操作和领域专家组成的多学科团队识别和限制系统进入导致损失的脆弱状态。这个新框架将安全分析的重点从威胁作为损失的直接原因转移到更广泛的系统结构上,该结构允许系统进入易受攻击的系统状态,威胁利用该状态产生导致损失的中断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信