The COVID-19 pandemic: new concerns and connections between eHealth and digital inequalities

Aneka Khilnani, J. Schulz, Laura Robinson
{"title":"The COVID-19 pandemic: new concerns and connections between eHealth and digital inequalities","authors":"Aneka Khilnani, J. Schulz, Laura Robinson","doi":"10.1108/jices-04-2020-0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nTelemedicine has been advancing for decades and is more indispensable than ever in this unprecedented time of the COVID-19 pandemic. As shown, eHealth appears to be effective for routine management of chronic conditions that require extensive and repeated interactions with healthcare professionals, as well as the monitoring of symptoms and diagnostics. Yet much needs to be done to alleviate digital inequalities that stand in the way of making the benefits of eHealth accessible to all. The purpose of this paper is to explore the recent shift in healthcare delivery in response to the COVID-19 pandemic towards telemedicine in healthcare delivery and show how this rapid shift is leaving behind those without digital resources and exacerbating inequalities along many axes.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBecause the digitally disadvantaged are less likely to use eHealth services, they bear greater risks during the pandemic to meet ongoing medical care needs. This holds true for both medical conditions necessitating lifelong care and conditions of particular urgency such as pregnancy. For this reason, the authors examine two case studies that exemplify the implications of differential access to eHealth: the case of chronic care diseases such as diabetes requiring ongoing care and the case of time-sensitive health conditions such as pregnancy that may be compromised by gaps in continuous care.\n\n\nFindings\nNot only are the digitally disadvantaged more likely to belong to populations experiencing greater risk – including age and economic class – but they are less likely to use eHealth services and thereby bear greater risks during the pandemic to meet ongoing medical care needs during the pandemic.\n\n\nSocial implications\nAt the time of writing, almost 20% of Americans have been unable to obtain medical prescriptions or needed medical care unrelated to the virus. In light of the potential of telemedicine, this does not need to be the case. These social inequalities take on particular significance in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nIn light of the COVID-19 virus, ongoing medical care requires exposure to risks that can be successfully managed by digital communications and eHealth advances. However, the benefits of eHealth are far less likely to accrue to the digitally disadvantaged.\n","PeriodicalId":156416,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-04-2020-0052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

Purpose Telemedicine has been advancing for decades and is more indispensable than ever in this unprecedented time of the COVID-19 pandemic. As shown, eHealth appears to be effective for routine management of chronic conditions that require extensive and repeated interactions with healthcare professionals, as well as the monitoring of symptoms and diagnostics. Yet much needs to be done to alleviate digital inequalities that stand in the way of making the benefits of eHealth accessible to all. The purpose of this paper is to explore the recent shift in healthcare delivery in response to the COVID-19 pandemic towards telemedicine in healthcare delivery and show how this rapid shift is leaving behind those without digital resources and exacerbating inequalities along many axes. Design/methodology/approach Because the digitally disadvantaged are less likely to use eHealth services, they bear greater risks during the pandemic to meet ongoing medical care needs. This holds true for both medical conditions necessitating lifelong care and conditions of particular urgency such as pregnancy. For this reason, the authors examine two case studies that exemplify the implications of differential access to eHealth: the case of chronic care diseases such as diabetes requiring ongoing care and the case of time-sensitive health conditions such as pregnancy that may be compromised by gaps in continuous care. Findings Not only are the digitally disadvantaged more likely to belong to populations experiencing greater risk – including age and economic class – but they are less likely to use eHealth services and thereby bear greater risks during the pandemic to meet ongoing medical care needs during the pandemic. Social implications At the time of writing, almost 20% of Americans have been unable to obtain medical prescriptions or needed medical care unrelated to the virus. In light of the potential of telemedicine, this does not need to be the case. These social inequalities take on particular significance in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Originality/value In light of the COVID-19 virus, ongoing medical care requires exposure to risks that can be successfully managed by digital communications and eHealth advances. However, the benefits of eHealth are far less likely to accrue to the digitally disadvantaged.
2019冠状病毒病大流行:电子卫生与数字不平等之间的新关切和联系
目的远程医疗已经发展了几十年,在这个前所未有的COVID-19大流行时期,远程医疗比以往任何时候都更加不可或缺。如上所示,电子保健似乎对需要与保健专业人员进行广泛和反复互动的慢性病的常规管理以及对症状和诊断的监测是有效的。然而,要减轻妨碍人人享有电子卫生福利的数字不平等,还有很多工作要做。本文旨在探讨最近为应对COVID-19大流行,医疗保健服务向远程医疗的转变,并展示这种快速转变如何将那些没有数字资源的人抛在身后,并加剧了许多方面的不平等。设计/方法/方法由于数字弱势群体不太可能使用电子卫生服务,因此他们在大流行期间承担更大的风险,以满足持续的医疗保健需求。这既适用于需要终身护理的医疗状况,也适用于怀孕等特别紧急的情况。出于这个原因,作者检查了两个案例研究,这些案例研究举例说明了电子卫生保健的不同获取方式的影响:慢性病(如糖尿病)需要持续护理的案例,以及时间敏感的健康状况(如怀孕)可能因持续护理的空白而受到损害的案例。调查结果数字弱势群体不仅更有可能属于面临更大风险的人群(包括年龄和经济阶层),而且他们不太可能使用电子保健服务,因此在大流行期间承担更大的风险,以满足大流行期间持续的医疗保健需求。在撰写本文时,近20%的美国人无法获得医疗处方或需要与病毒无关的医疗服务。鉴于远程医疗的潜力,情况并非如此。鉴于2019冠状病毒病大流行,这些社会不平等现象显得尤为重要。鉴于COVID-19病毒,持续的医疗保健需要暴露于可通过数字通信和电子卫生进步成功管理的风险。然而,电子医疗的好处不太可能惠及数字弱势群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信