Comparison of Semantic Segmentation Deep Learning Methods for Building Extraction

Anisa Aizatin, I. B. Nugraha
{"title":"Comparison of Semantic Segmentation Deep Learning Methods for Building Extraction","authors":"Anisa Aizatin, I. B. Nugraha","doi":"10.1109/CENIM56801.2022.10037426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban planners use building extraction on satellite imagery to support government policies. However, the complex depiction of buildings in satellite imagery makes building extraction difficult. One way to extract buildings in satellite imagery is by semantic segmentation deep learning. This study aims to find a suitable deep learning semantic segmentation method by comparing the performance of UNet, UNet++, DeepLabV3, and DeepLabV3+ that combined with ResNet-101 and ResNet-50 as feature extraction algorithms and trained on two public datasets with different characteristics. UNet++ produces the highest performance for predicting both datasets, but with different feature extraction algorithms. MBD feature extraction is more suitable using ResNet-101 while AICrowd uses ResNet-50. However, if we consider time-consuming, DeepLabV3+ and UNet are more efficient for training building datasets because of consuming less time with quietly performance","PeriodicalId":118934,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CENIM56801.2022.10037426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban planners use building extraction on satellite imagery to support government policies. However, the complex depiction of buildings in satellite imagery makes building extraction difficult. One way to extract buildings in satellite imagery is by semantic segmentation deep learning. This study aims to find a suitable deep learning semantic segmentation method by comparing the performance of UNet, UNet++, DeepLabV3, and DeepLabV3+ that combined with ResNet-101 and ResNet-50 as feature extraction algorithms and trained on two public datasets with different characteristics. UNet++ produces the highest performance for predicting both datasets, but with different feature extraction algorithms. MBD feature extraction is more suitable using ResNet-101 while AICrowd uses ResNet-50. However, if we consider time-consuming, DeepLabV3+ and UNet are more efficient for training building datasets because of consuming less time with quietly performance
语义分割深度学习方法在建筑提取中的比较
城市规划者利用卫星图像提取建筑物来支持政府政策。然而,卫星图像中复杂的建筑物描述给建筑物提取带来了困难。从卫星图像中提取建筑物的一种方法是通过语义分割深度学习。本研究旨在通过对比UNet、UNet++、DeepLabV3和DeepLabV3+结合ResNet-101和ResNet-50作为特征提取算法,并在两个不同特征的公共数据集上进行训练,寻找一种适合的深度学习语义分割方法。unnet++在预测这两种数据集时产生了最高的性能,但使用了不同的特征提取算法。MBD特征提取更适合使用ResNet-101,而AICrowd使用ResNet-50。然而,如果我们考虑到耗时,DeepLabV3+和UNet对于训练构建数据集更有效,因为它们在安静性能上消耗的时间更少
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信