Critical Decisions in Crisis Management: Rational Strategies of Decision Making

M. Coccia
{"title":"Critical Decisions in Crisis Management: Rational Strategies of Decision Making","authors":"M. Coccia","doi":"10.1453/JEL.V7I2.2049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Turbulent environment can create crises that management has to soles in a limited time with critical decisions. Critical decisions are an attempt to apply efficient modes of cognition and action to enable the organization to cope with consequential environmental threats or take advantage of important opportunities in the presence of highly restricted time in turbulent markets and/or specific situations. Critical decisions involve a process of the organization’s leadership to think, consult, act, gain acceptance for optimal solutions to complex problems in the presence of highly restricted time in crisis given by scarce resources, uncertain factors, aversive environment, environmental difficulties, ambiguous circumstances, unclear and volatile situations, or a combination of these factors. This study presents the endogenous and exogenous types of crises for organizations and vital factors for critical decisions that can be categorized in responsitive, proactive and recovery critical decisions. After that, the study shows strategic operations and steps of critical decisions in a perspective of reductionism, and a rational structure based on tree diagram to systematize the process of decision making. The study here also suggests strategies for critical decisions in different environments based on theory of rational choice, such as max-min, max-max and min-max approaches, described with a vital example.  Final part of this study shows how a complex problem can be treated in different ways in a wider perspective of ecological rationality by approaches of resolution, solution and dissolution. The implications of strategic management are that the approach of dissolution of a complex problem requires design of a critical decision that may incorporate research and trial and error activities. Overall, then, this paper suggests one of the most effective way of solving systemic and complex problems by private and public organizations operating in, more and more, turbulent markets and volatile environments. Keywords.  Strategic management, Decision making, Critical decision, Crisis management, Competitive advantage, Strategies, Strategic change, Business Strategy, Operational excellence, Problem solving, Bounded rationality, Decision rule, Decision theory, Natural disasters, Risk management, Bounded rationality, Environmental threats, Ecological rationality, Theory of rational choice. JEL. C44, D70, D81, D91, H12, M51, Q54.","PeriodicalId":306152,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1453/JEL.V7I2.2049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract. Turbulent environment can create crises that management has to soles in a limited time with critical decisions. Critical decisions are an attempt to apply efficient modes of cognition and action to enable the organization to cope with consequential environmental threats or take advantage of important opportunities in the presence of highly restricted time in turbulent markets and/or specific situations. Critical decisions involve a process of the organization’s leadership to think, consult, act, gain acceptance for optimal solutions to complex problems in the presence of highly restricted time in crisis given by scarce resources, uncertain factors, aversive environment, environmental difficulties, ambiguous circumstances, unclear and volatile situations, or a combination of these factors. This study presents the endogenous and exogenous types of crises for organizations and vital factors for critical decisions that can be categorized in responsitive, proactive and recovery critical decisions. After that, the study shows strategic operations and steps of critical decisions in a perspective of reductionism, and a rational structure based on tree diagram to systematize the process of decision making. The study here also suggests strategies for critical decisions in different environments based on theory of rational choice, such as max-min, max-max and min-max approaches, described with a vital example.  Final part of this study shows how a complex problem can be treated in different ways in a wider perspective of ecological rationality by approaches of resolution, solution and dissolution. The implications of strategic management are that the approach of dissolution of a complex problem requires design of a critical decision that may incorporate research and trial and error activities. Overall, then, this paper suggests one of the most effective way of solving systemic and complex problems by private and public organizations operating in, more and more, turbulent markets and volatile environments. Keywords.  Strategic management, Decision making, Critical decision, Crisis management, Competitive advantage, Strategies, Strategic change, Business Strategy, Operational excellence, Problem solving, Bounded rationality, Decision rule, Decision theory, Natural disasters, Risk management, Bounded rationality, Environmental threats, Ecological rationality, Theory of rational choice. JEL. C44, D70, D81, D91, H12, M51, Q54.
危机管理中的关键决策:决策的理性策略
摘要动荡的环境会产生危机,管理层必须在有限的时间内通过关键决策来解决危机。关键决策是一种尝试,运用有效的认知和行动模式,使组织能够应对随之而来的环境威胁,或在动荡的市场和/或特定情况下,在高度有限的时间内利用重要机会。关键决策涉及组织领导在稀缺资源、不确定因素、令人厌恶的环境、环境困难、模棱两可的情况、不明确和不稳定的情况或这些因素的组合所造成的危机中,在高度有限的时间内,思考、咨询、行动、获得对复杂问题最佳解决方案的接受的过程。本研究提出了组织危机的内源性和外源性类型,以及关键决策的重要因素,可分为响应性、主动性和恢复性关键决策。然后,以还原论的视角展示关键决策的战略操作和步骤,并基于树形图的合理结构,使决策过程系统化。这里的研究还提出了基于理性选择理论的不同环境下的关键决策策略,如最大-最小、最大-最大和最小-最大方法,并以一个重要的例子进行了描述。本研究的最后一部分展示了如何在更广泛的生态理性视角下,通过决议、解决和解散的方法,以不同的方式处理一个复杂的问题。战略管理的含义是,解决复杂问题的方法需要设计一个可能包含研究和试错活动的关键决策。总的来说,本文提出了在越来越动荡的市场和环境中运作的私营和公共组织解决系统性和复杂问题的最有效方法之一。关键词。战略管理、决策制定、关键决策、危机管理、竞争优势、战略、战略变革、商业战略、卓越运营、解决问题、有限理性、决策规则、决策理论、自然灾害、风险管理、有限理性、环境威胁、生态理性、理性选择理论。冻胶。C44, d70, d81, d91, h12, m51, q54。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信