Comparing Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine in Breast Cancer Problem

Caecilia Bintang Girik Allo, L. Putra, N. R. Paranoan, Vincentius Abdi Gunawan
{"title":"Comparing Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine in Breast Cancer Problem","authors":"Caecilia Bintang Girik Allo, L. Putra, N. R. Paranoan, Vincentius Abdi Gunawan","doi":"10.34312/jjps.v4i1.19246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are several methods used for the classification problems. There are many different kinds of fields that can be used. Nowadays, Support Vector Machine (SVM) is a popular classification method that has been proposed by many researchers. Using the same method but different distribution methods for creating training and testing data in the same dataset can yield varying results in terms of prediction accuracy, which is crucial in classification. In this paper, we compare the prediction accuracy between SVM results and Logistic Regression results to determine the better method to  classify the current condition of the patient after undergoing some treatment.  Several treatments are used in this paper, including feature selection, feature extraction, separating the train and testing data using Holdout and K-Fold CV. Stepwise selection is done to reduce the features. Training and testing dataset is obtained using the five stratified and non-stratified holdout and five fold stratified and non-stratified cross validation. The result shows that the best method to classify the cancer dataset is five fold stratified cross validation SVM with radial kernel. The obtained accuracy is 81,816% with variance as much as 0,94%.","PeriodicalId":315674,"journal":{"name":"Jambura Journal of Probability and Statistics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jambura Journal of Probability and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34312/jjps.v4i1.19246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are several methods used for the classification problems. There are many different kinds of fields that can be used. Nowadays, Support Vector Machine (SVM) is a popular classification method that has been proposed by many researchers. Using the same method but different distribution methods for creating training and testing data in the same dataset can yield varying results in terms of prediction accuracy, which is crucial in classification. In this paper, we compare the prediction accuracy between SVM results and Logistic Regression results to determine the better method to  classify the current condition of the patient after undergoing some treatment.  Several treatments are used in this paper, including feature selection, feature extraction, separating the train and testing data using Holdout and K-Fold CV. Stepwise selection is done to reduce the features. Training and testing dataset is obtained using the five stratified and non-stratified holdout and five fold stratified and non-stratified cross validation. The result shows that the best method to classify the cancer dataset is five fold stratified cross validation SVM with radial kernel. The obtained accuracy is 81,816% with variance as much as 0,94%.
Logistic回归与支持向量机在乳腺癌问题中的比较
有几种方法用于分类问题。有许多不同类型的字段可以使用。支持向量机(SVM)是目前许多研究者提出的一种流行的分类方法。在同一数据集中使用相同的方法但不同的分布方法来创建训练和测试数据,在预测精度方面会产生不同的结果,这在分类中是至关重要的。在本文中,我们比较了SVM结果和Logistic回归结果的预测精度,以确定更好的方法来对患者进行治疗后的现状进行分类。本文使用了几种处理方法,包括特征选择、特征提取、分离训练和使用Holdout和K-Fold CV测试数据。逐步选择以减少特征。训练和测试数据集使用五次分层和非分层抵制以及五次分层和非分层交叉验证获得。结果表明,对癌症数据进行分类的最佳方法是径向核五重分层交叉验证支持向量机。得到的准确率为81816%,方差高达0.94%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信