A comparative study of the effect of dexamethasone versus its use with clonidine on postoperative sore throat and hoarseness of voice

M. Mohamed, R. Mohamed, Medhat Khali Mohamed, Hamed Khattab
{"title":"A comparative study of the effect of dexamethasone versus its use with clonidine on postoperative sore throat and hoarseness of voice","authors":"M. Mohamed, R. Mohamed, Medhat Khali Mohamed, Hamed Khattab","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_9_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regardless of some preventive measures, postoperative sore throat (POST) and hoarseness of voice are most undesirable and most frequent complication in the post-operative period [1,2]. Postoperatively it seems reasonable that most of the signs and symptoms are the result of mucosal injury which leads to inflammation caused by the process of air way instrumentation, also its postulated etiology has been associated with mucosal dehydration or edema, tracheal ischemia secondary to the pressure of endotracheal tube cuffs, aggressive oropharyngeal suctioning and mucosal erosion from friction between delicate tissues and the endotracheal tube (ETT) [4,5]. Aim, the primary outcome was to compare between the effects of Dexamethasone alone versus its use with Clonidine on post-operative sore throat. The secondary outcome was to compare between the effects of Dexamethasone alone versus its use with Clonidine on post-operative hoarseness of voice. Method, this prospective controlled randomized double- blind study was carried on 126 patients divided into two groups the Dexa group 63 and Dexaclonidine group 63. Randomization were done by using closed envelop technique opened immediately before induction by an anaesthetist who was unaware of the study protocol and responsible for preparing the study drugs. Patient in Dexaclonidine group received oral 150 microgram Clonidine tablet one hour before induction, whereas patients in the Dexa group received placebo which is multivitamin tablet with the same shape and size of Clonidine. Both Clonidine and placebo were covered with nontransparent paper. Patients in both groups were received 5 ml of normal saline containing Dexamethasone (8 mg) iv at 30 min before anaesthetic induction. Sedation with midazolam was given (0.05 mg/kg) IV 15 minutes before surgery for the two groups. On arrival to operating room patients were cannulated and monitored with electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry and capnography. Anaesthesia was induced with intravenous propofol (2 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1–1.5 micro g/kg) after approximately 5 min of preoxygenation and face mask ventilation. Rocuronium (0.6–0.8 mg/ kg) was administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation after using of nerve stimulator (train of four) to ensure complete muscle relaxation before intubation, an endotracheal tube were inserted (ETTs) after Cormack-Lehane scoring (13) of internal diameter 7.0 and 7.5 were used for females and males, respectively by Direct laryngoscopy with either a Macintosh blade size 3 or 4. The ETTs were inserted so that the vocal cords were located between the two indicator marks on the proximal part of the tube shaft. Intubations were confirmed by capnography and chest auscultation for equality of air entry on both sides. None of the patients received topical lidocaine or lidocaine jelly during the intubation procedure. The lungs were ventilated with 50% air 50% oxygen; ventilation was adjusted to maintain an end tidal carbon dioxide of 35–45 mmHg. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane and intermittent bolus dose of rocuronium. Isoflurane concentration was adjusted to minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) 1–1,5% according to haemodynamics. After the end of surgery, residual neuromuscular relaxation was reversed by Neostigmine (0.03_0.07 mg/ kg) and Atropine (0,02–0,1 mg/kg). Oropharyngeal suction was gently performed under direct vision by soft suction catheter with sideway port to avoid trauma to the tissues before extubation, one end of the catheter was attached to an aspirator or collection canister and the unattached end was placed directly into a tube to extract secretions safely without injury to the mucous membranes. Conclusion From this study including that addition of clonidine to dexamethasone was more superior in reducing POST & hoarseness of voice than dexamethasone alone, resulted in more haemodynamic stability in both intra operative and early post-operative period. Result From this study, there was statistically significant difference between the two studied groups regarding the sore throat and hoarseness of voice incidence and grade (P value < 0.05). so, Addition of clonidine to dexamethasone was more superior in reducing POST & hoarseness of voice than dexamethasone alone.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_9_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regardless of some preventive measures, postoperative sore throat (POST) and hoarseness of voice are most undesirable and most frequent complication in the post-operative period [1,2]. Postoperatively it seems reasonable that most of the signs and symptoms are the result of mucosal injury which leads to inflammation caused by the process of air way instrumentation, also its postulated etiology has been associated with mucosal dehydration or edema, tracheal ischemia secondary to the pressure of endotracheal tube cuffs, aggressive oropharyngeal suctioning and mucosal erosion from friction between delicate tissues and the endotracheal tube (ETT) [4,5]. Aim, the primary outcome was to compare between the effects of Dexamethasone alone versus its use with Clonidine on post-operative sore throat. The secondary outcome was to compare between the effects of Dexamethasone alone versus its use with Clonidine on post-operative hoarseness of voice. Method, this prospective controlled randomized double- blind study was carried on 126 patients divided into two groups the Dexa group 63 and Dexaclonidine group 63. Randomization were done by using closed envelop technique opened immediately before induction by an anaesthetist who was unaware of the study protocol and responsible for preparing the study drugs. Patient in Dexaclonidine group received oral 150 microgram Clonidine tablet one hour before induction, whereas patients in the Dexa group received placebo which is multivitamin tablet with the same shape and size of Clonidine. Both Clonidine and placebo were covered with nontransparent paper. Patients in both groups were received 5 ml of normal saline containing Dexamethasone (8 mg) iv at 30 min before anaesthetic induction. Sedation with midazolam was given (0.05 mg/kg) IV 15 minutes before surgery for the two groups. On arrival to operating room patients were cannulated and monitored with electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry and capnography. Anaesthesia was induced with intravenous propofol (2 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1–1.5 micro g/kg) after approximately 5 min of preoxygenation and face mask ventilation. Rocuronium (0.6–0.8 mg/ kg) was administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation after using of nerve stimulator (train of four) to ensure complete muscle relaxation before intubation, an endotracheal tube were inserted (ETTs) after Cormack-Lehane scoring (13) of internal diameter 7.0 and 7.5 were used for females and males, respectively by Direct laryngoscopy with either a Macintosh blade size 3 or 4. The ETTs were inserted so that the vocal cords were located between the two indicator marks on the proximal part of the tube shaft. Intubations were confirmed by capnography and chest auscultation for equality of air entry on both sides. None of the patients received topical lidocaine or lidocaine jelly during the intubation procedure. The lungs were ventilated with 50% air 50% oxygen; ventilation was adjusted to maintain an end tidal carbon dioxide of 35–45 mmHg. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane and intermittent bolus dose of rocuronium. Isoflurane concentration was adjusted to minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) 1–1,5% according to haemodynamics. After the end of surgery, residual neuromuscular relaxation was reversed by Neostigmine (0.03_0.07 mg/ kg) and Atropine (0,02–0,1 mg/kg). Oropharyngeal suction was gently performed under direct vision by soft suction catheter with sideway port to avoid trauma to the tissues before extubation, one end of the catheter was attached to an aspirator or collection canister and the unattached end was placed directly into a tube to extract secretions safely without injury to the mucous membranes. Conclusion From this study including that addition of clonidine to dexamethasone was more superior in reducing POST & hoarseness of voice than dexamethasone alone, resulted in more haemodynamic stability in both intra operative and early post-operative period. Result From this study, there was statistically significant difference between the two studied groups regarding the sore throat and hoarseness of voice incidence and grade (P value < 0.05). so, Addition of clonidine to dexamethasone was more superior in reducing POST & hoarseness of voice than dexamethasone alone.
地塞米松与可乐定联合应用对术后咽喉痛和声音嘶哑的影响比较研究
尽管采取了一些预防措施,但术后喉咙痛和声音嘶哑是术后最不希望出现的也是最常见的并发症[1,2]。术后,大多数体征和症状似乎是气道内置过程中粘膜损伤导致炎症的结果,其假定的病因也与粘膜脱水或水肿、气管内管袖口压力引起的气管缺血、口咽剧烈吸引以及气管内管(ETT)与脆弱组织摩擦引起的粘膜侵蚀有关[4,5]。目的是比较单独使用地塞米松和与可乐定联合使用地塞米松对术后喉咙痛的影响。次要结果是比较单独使用地塞米松与与可乐定联合使用地塞米松对术后声音嘶哑的影响。方法:将126例患者分为地塞米松组(63)和地塞米松组(63)进行前瞻性对照随机双盲研究。随机化采用封闭信封技术,在诱导前由不了解研究方案并负责准备研究药物的麻醉师立即打开。Dexaclonidine组患者在诱导前1小时口服150微克可乐定片,而Dexa组患者服用安慰剂,即与可乐定形状和大小相同的复合维生素片。可乐定和安慰剂都用不透明的纸覆盖。两组患者均于麻醉诱导前30 min给予含地塞米松(8 mg)静脉滴注生理盐水5 ml。两组患者术前15分钟给予咪达唑仑(0.05 mg/kg)静脉镇静。患者到达手术室后插管并监测心电图、无创血压、脉搏血氧仪和血管造影。在预充氧和面罩通气约5min后,静脉注射异丙酚(2mg /kg)和芬太尼(1-1.5微g/kg)麻醉。在使用神经刺激器(四组)后给予罗库溴胺(0.6-0.8 mg/ kg)以促进气管插管,以确保插管前肌肉完全放松,在cormark - lehane评分(13)内径7.0和7.5后插入气管插管,女性和男性分别使用Macintosh刀片大小为3或4的直接喉镜检查。插入导管,使声带位于管轴近端的两个指示标记之间。插管后经导管造影及胸部听诊确认两侧空气进入均匀。在插管过程中,没有患者接受局部利多卡因或利多卡因果冻。肺用50%空气50%氧气通气;调整通风以维持潮汐末二氧化碳35-45 mmHg。维持异氟醚麻醉,间歇给药罗库溴铵。根据血流动力学调整异氟烷浓度至最小肺泡浓度(MAC) 1 - 1,5%。手术结束后,新斯的明(0.03 ~ 0.07 mg/kg)和阿托品(0,02 ~ 0,1 mg/kg)可逆转残余神经肌肉松弛。拔管前,采用斜口软吸导管,在直视下轻吸口咽,避免损伤组织,导管一端附着于吸引器或收集罐上,未附着的一端直接放入管中,安全吸出分泌物,不损伤粘膜。结论:地塞米松联合可乐定治疗后声嘶比单用地塞米松更有效,术中及术后早期血流动力学稳定性更好。结果本研究中,两组患者喉咙痛、声音嘶哑的发生率及分级比较,差异均有统计学意义(P值< 0.05)。因此,地塞米松联合可乐定治疗后声嘶的效果优于单用地塞米松。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信