EU Judicial Procedures and Case Law Databases: What's Going on and What May Lay Ahead?

E. A. Onţanu, M. Velicogna
{"title":"EU Judicial Procedures and Case Law Databases: What's Going on and What May Lay Ahead?","authors":"E. A. Onţanu, M. Velicogna","doi":"10.3233/FAIA190026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The raise of computational power, the boost of electronic data storage \ncapabilities, and the growing ubiquitousness of the Internet facilitate the collection \nof legal information and increases its availability for stakeholders. In this context, \nEU institutions and key stakeholders are seeking to support initiatives that provide \naccess to legislation and case law. This is considered paramount for economic activities, facilitating access to justice, and upholding the rule of law. This Chapter investigates existing electronic databases created to disseminate case law information \non the application of EU judicial procedures and explores these databases ability \nto improve the application of European procedural instruments, forwarding their \nuse and the creation of a common legal understanding. The analysis addresses also \nthe possibilities opened by e-CODEX to integrated cross-national legal database \nsupported by technology developments. The e-CODEX handled cross-border judicial procedures can lead to digital by default judgments in European uniform \nprocedures. These procedures are based on electronic forms supporting structured \ndata exchange. A database relying on these data may be designed to include not \nonly the judgment data, but also many other data generated during the procedure, \nwhich could be used to support ‘smarter’ research for practitioners and interested \nparties. This can significantly reduce subsequent expert interventions in classifying \nor anonymizing case law data. Additional data generated by the procedures, but not \nincluded in the decisions could also enrich the database. Furthermore, as e-CODEX \nsupports semantic interoperability, much of the structured data is expected to be \nmultilingual by default.","PeriodicalId":402120,"journal":{"name":"Law via the Internet","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law via the Internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA190026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The raise of computational power, the boost of electronic data storage capabilities, and the growing ubiquitousness of the Internet facilitate the collection of legal information and increases its availability for stakeholders. In this context, EU institutions and key stakeholders are seeking to support initiatives that provide access to legislation and case law. This is considered paramount for economic activities, facilitating access to justice, and upholding the rule of law. This Chapter investigates existing electronic databases created to disseminate case law information on the application of EU judicial procedures and explores these databases ability to improve the application of European procedural instruments, forwarding their use and the creation of a common legal understanding. The analysis addresses also the possibilities opened by e-CODEX to integrated cross-national legal database supported by technology developments. The e-CODEX handled cross-border judicial procedures can lead to digital by default judgments in European uniform procedures. These procedures are based on electronic forms supporting structured data exchange. A database relying on these data may be designed to include not only the judgment data, but also many other data generated during the procedure, which could be used to support ‘smarter’ research for practitioners and interested parties. This can significantly reduce subsequent expert interventions in classifying or anonymizing case law data. Additional data generated by the procedures, but not included in the decisions could also enrich the database. Furthermore, as e-CODEX supports semantic interoperability, much of the structured data is expected to be multilingual by default.
欧盟司法程序和判例法数据库:正在发生的和未来可能发生的?
计算能力的提高、电子数据存储能力的增强以及互联网的日益普及为法律信息的收集提供了便利,并增加了利益相关者获取法律信息的机会。在此背景下,欧盟机构和主要利益相关者正在寻求支持提供立法和判例法的举措。这被认为对经济活动、促进诉诸司法和维护法治至关重要。本章调查了为传播欧盟司法程序适用的判例法信息而创建的现有电子数据库,并探讨了这些数据库改善欧洲程序文书适用、促进其使用和建立共同法律理解的能力。该分析还涉及电子食品法典为技术发展支持的综合跨国法律数据库提供的可能性。电子法典处理的跨境司法程序可能导致欧洲统一程序中的数字默认判决。这些程序基于支持结构化数据交换的电子表格。一个依赖于这些数据的数据库可以被设计成不仅包括判断数据,还包括在过程中产生的许多其他数据,这些数据可以用来支持从业者和相关方的“更聪明”的研究。这可以显著减少后续专家对判例法数据分类或匿名化的干预。由程序产生但未列入决定的其他数据也可丰富数据库。此外,由于电子法典支持语义互操作性,预计许多结构化数据在默认情况下是多语言的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信