{"title":"EU Judicial Procedures and Case Law Databases: What's Going on and What May Lay Ahead?","authors":"E. A. Onţanu, M. Velicogna","doi":"10.3233/FAIA190026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The raise of computational power, the boost of electronic data storage \ncapabilities, and the growing ubiquitousness of the Internet facilitate the collection \nof legal information and increases its availability for stakeholders. In this context, \nEU institutions and key stakeholders are seeking to support initiatives that provide \naccess to legislation and case law. This is considered paramount for economic activities, facilitating access to justice, and upholding the rule of law. This Chapter investigates existing electronic databases created to disseminate case law information \non the application of EU judicial procedures and explores these databases ability \nto improve the application of European procedural instruments, forwarding their \nuse and the creation of a common legal understanding. The analysis addresses also \nthe possibilities opened by e-CODEX to integrated cross-national legal database \nsupported by technology developments. The e-CODEX handled cross-border judicial procedures can lead to digital by default judgments in European uniform \nprocedures. These procedures are based on electronic forms supporting structured \ndata exchange. A database relying on these data may be designed to include not \nonly the judgment data, but also many other data generated during the procedure, \nwhich could be used to support ‘smarter’ research for practitioners and interested \nparties. This can significantly reduce subsequent expert interventions in classifying \nor anonymizing case law data. Additional data generated by the procedures, but not \nincluded in the decisions could also enrich the database. Furthermore, as e-CODEX \nsupports semantic interoperability, much of the structured data is expected to be \nmultilingual by default.","PeriodicalId":402120,"journal":{"name":"Law via the Internet","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law via the Internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA190026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The raise of computational power, the boost of electronic data storage
capabilities, and the growing ubiquitousness of the Internet facilitate the collection
of legal information and increases its availability for stakeholders. In this context,
EU institutions and key stakeholders are seeking to support initiatives that provide
access to legislation and case law. This is considered paramount for economic activities, facilitating access to justice, and upholding the rule of law. This Chapter investigates existing electronic databases created to disseminate case law information
on the application of EU judicial procedures and explores these databases ability
to improve the application of European procedural instruments, forwarding their
use and the creation of a common legal understanding. The analysis addresses also
the possibilities opened by e-CODEX to integrated cross-national legal database
supported by technology developments. The e-CODEX handled cross-border judicial procedures can lead to digital by default judgments in European uniform
procedures. These procedures are based on electronic forms supporting structured
data exchange. A database relying on these data may be designed to include not
only the judgment data, but also many other data generated during the procedure,
which could be used to support ‘smarter’ research for practitioners and interested
parties. This can significantly reduce subsequent expert interventions in classifying
or anonymizing case law data. Additional data generated by the procedures, but not
included in the decisions could also enrich the database. Furthermore, as e-CODEX
supports semantic interoperability, much of the structured data is expected to be
multilingual by default.