Do Audit Committees Have Capacity to Monitor Management: The Case of Serbia

Savka Vučković-Milutinović
{"title":"Do Audit Committees Have Capacity to Monitor Management: The Case of Serbia","authors":"Savka Vučković-Milutinović","doi":"10.24818/MER/2019.06-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we examine audit committees composition and work in companies in Serbia. Audit committees are seen as integral part of the modern system of corporate governance worldwide which role is even reinforced with new EU Auditing Directive. According to the agency theory, this committee shell contribute to the prevention of management opportunistic behaviour by performing set of monitoring activities. In this study, we intend to illuminate actual capabilities of audit committees in Serbia. We perform content analysis to assess transparency of companies with regard to audit committees and formal assumptions for the design and work of audit committees. In addition, we conduct a survey of external auditors to uncover substance of the audit committee performance. Our results show that the current state of the audit committee in Serbia is not satisfactory. We find that the level of audit committee disclosure is low, formal standards for audit committee composition and responsibilities are not fully in line with EU regulation and audit committee substance is fairly missed. Management is not effectively monitored by audit committee and it still has more power than audit committee in the process of selection of the external auditor. This paper contributes to the discussion about audit committee effectiveness with focus on an emerging country where audit committee does not have long tradition. Our findings reveal that Serbian companies have to make significant improvements in order to have audit committees able to perform substantial monitoring.","PeriodicalId":223559,"journal":{"name":"MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS REVIEW","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/MER/2019.06-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we examine audit committees composition and work in companies in Serbia. Audit committees are seen as integral part of the modern system of corporate governance worldwide which role is even reinforced with new EU Auditing Directive. According to the agency theory, this committee shell contribute to the prevention of management opportunistic behaviour by performing set of monitoring activities. In this study, we intend to illuminate actual capabilities of audit committees in Serbia. We perform content analysis to assess transparency of companies with regard to audit committees and formal assumptions for the design and work of audit committees. In addition, we conduct a survey of external auditors to uncover substance of the audit committee performance. Our results show that the current state of the audit committee in Serbia is not satisfactory. We find that the level of audit committee disclosure is low, formal standards for audit committee composition and responsibilities are not fully in line with EU regulation and audit committee substance is fairly missed. Management is not effectively monitored by audit committee and it still has more power than audit committee in the process of selection of the external auditor. This paper contributes to the discussion about audit committee effectiveness with focus on an emerging country where audit committee does not have long tradition. Our findings reveal that Serbian companies have to make significant improvements in order to have audit committees able to perform substantial monitoring.
审计委员会是否有能力监督管理层:塞尔维亚的案例
在本文中,我们检查审计委员会的组成和工作在塞尔维亚的公司。审计委员会在世界范围内被视为现代公司治理体系的组成部分,其作用甚至在新的欧盟审计指令中得到加强。根据代理理论,该委员会将通过执行一套监测活动,有助于防止管理层机会主义行为。在本研究中,我们打算阐明塞尔维亚审计委员会的实际能力。我们进行内容分析,以评估公司在审计委员会方面的透明度,并对审计委员会的设计和工作进行正式假设。此外,我们对外部审计师进行调查,以揭示审计委员会绩效的实质。我们的研究结果表明,目前塞尔维亚审计委员会的状况并不令人满意。我们发现审计委员会的信息披露水平较低,审计委员会组成和职责的正式标准与欧盟法规不完全一致,审计委员会的实质内容相当缺失。审计委员会没有对管理层进行有效的监督,在选择外部审计师的过程中,审计委员会仍然拥有比审计委员会更大的权力。本文对审计委员会的有效性进行了探讨,并以一个审计委员会传统不长的新兴国家为研究对象。我们的调查结果表明,塞尔维亚公司必须作出重大改进,以便审计委员会能够进行实质性监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信